PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026European Journal of Radiology Open0 citationsOpen Access

CAD-RADS 2.0: Comparison of methods for assessment of plaque burden

IPIvan PlatzekKNKrzysztof NoconSMSuela Mema

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the agreement between different methods for assessing coronary plaque burden in CAD-RADS 2.0.
  • Comparison of various plaque assessment methods allowed in CAD-RADS 2.0
  • Evaluation of interrater agreement using segment involvement score and visual plaque estimate
  • Analysis of overall CAD-RADS 2.0 category agreement
  • Interrater agreement for segment involvement score and visual plaque estimate is high
  • Overall categories in CAD-RADS 2.0 demonstrate substantial interrater agreement
  • Methods show moderate to substantial agreement overall for plaque burden assessment

Abstract

The methods for coronary plaque burden assessment allowed in CAD-RADS 2.0 show moderate to substantial agreement. . Interrater agreement for the segment involvement score (SIS) and visual plaque estimate is high. Overall CAD-RADS 2.0 categories show a high degree of interrater agreement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Platzek et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b62685696592c86eae69https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2026.100752
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper