PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Boomerang effects of vaccination promotion and the roles of psychological reactance, message fatigue, and social norms

ZLZixi LiHZHuijun ZhuangXXXiaoyu xia

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how psychological reactance, message fatigue, and social norms influence vaccine refusal in influenza vaccination campaigns.
  • Conducted an online experiment with U.S. adults (N = 648)
  • Analyzed data using multigroup structural equation modeling
  • Examined the impact of perceived threats to freedom and social norms on vaccine refusal.
  • Psychological reactance significantly increased vaccine refusal due to perceived threats and message fatigue.
  • Perceived descriptive norms amplified the relationship between reactance and refusal.
  • Injunctive norms did not moderate the effects observed.

Abstract

Boomerang effects in influenza vaccination campaigns can undermine immunization efforts by increasing vaccine refusal. To effectively reduce these counterproductive outcomes, practitioners should not only communicate the risks and benefits of influenza vaccination but also consider whether their communication strategies could inadvertently trigger boomerang effects. Understanding why and how these effects occur is therefore crucial. This study investigates the mechanisms and boundary conditions underlying boomerang effects in influenza vaccine communication. Specifically, we examined psychological reactance as the key mechanism, focusing on immediate threats to freedom induced by persuasive messages and message fatigue resulting from prolonged exposure. Additionally, we explored how normative perceptions act as boundary conditions. An online experiment with U.S. adults (N = 648) analyzed via multigroup structural equation modeling revealed that both perceived threat to freedom and message fatigue were significant antecedents of psychological reactance, which was associated with increased vaccine refusal. Furthermore, perceived descriptive norms amplified these associations, whereas injunctive norms did not moderate them. These findings underscore the practical importance of carefully crafting vaccination messages that minimize perceived threats and avoid overexposure while considering social norms to reduce psychological reactance and enhance vaccination uptake.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b6aa85696592c86eafc1https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49592-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influenza Viruses and Vaccines: The Role of Vaccine Effectiveness Studies for Evaluation of the Benefits of Influenza Vaccines2022 · 145 citations
  2. 2On the Nature of Reactance and its Role in Persuasive Health Communication2005 · 1,551 citations
  3. 3Psychological profiles of anti-vaccination argument endorsement2023 · 40 citations
  4. 4Persuasive Messages, Social Norms, and Reactance: A Study of Masking Behavior during a COVID-19 Campus Health Campaign2021 · 68 citations
  5. 5The Impact of Behavioral Topic on Psychological Reactance: Arousal and Freedom Restoration2022 · 13 citations