PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026BMC Nursing0 citationsOpen Access

The experience of nursing students using generative artificial intelligence: a qualitative meta-synthesis

SWSihua WangSNShuzhen NiuZXZHANG Xinyu

Key Points

  • This research aims to synthesize qualitative findings about nursing students' experiences using generative artificial intelligence.
  • Conducted a qualitative systematic review of studies from multiple databases
  • Evaluated methodological quality using specific appraisal criteria
  • Synthesized findings into themes based on experiences with generative artificial intelligence
  • Identified 41 findings within four main themes: benefits, shortcomings, risks, and needs
  • Revealed that nursing students have complex and sometimes contradictory experiences with generative AI
  • Suggested improvements in technical and educational support for safe AI usage among nursing students

Abstract

Objective This study systematically integrated qualitative research regarding nursing students’ experiences using Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI). It aimed to provide an evidence-based basis to facilitate the safe, appropriate, and effective use of GAI among nursing students. Design A qualitative systematic review. Data sources PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed were searched for qualitative studies addressing nursing students’ experiences with GAI, covering the period from January 1, 2015, to January 29, 2026. Methods The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using qualitative research quality appraisal criteria developed by the JBI Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care (Australia). A meta-synthesis approach was used to synthesize findings, and the ConQual tool was applied to assess confidence in the results. Results Twenty-four studies were included, producing 41 findings grouped into 11 sub-themes and subsequently synthesized into four themes: perceived benefits, perceived shortcomings, perceived risks, and perceived needs. Conclusions Nursing students’ experiences with GAI were found to be complex and sometimes contradictory. Therefore, educational institutions, educators, and technology developers should enhance relevant technical, educational, and policy support frameworks to ensure the appropriate, safe, and effective use of GAI tools among nursing students. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b6aa85696592c86eb0adhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-04663-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper