PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Journal of Cancer Education0 citationsOpen Access

Teach-Back-Centered Multidimensional Health Education in Hospitalized Patients with Multiple Myeloma: a Single-Center Prospective Controlled Study of Quality of Life and Emotional Outcomes

XYXuehua YanJZJun ZhuWZWeiwei Zhao

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the impact of a teach-back–centered intervention on quality of life and emotional outcomes in hospitalized patients with multiple myeloma.
  • Conducted a single-center prospective controlled study with 195 hospitalized patients.
  • The intervention group received teach-back disease education along with psychological and lifestyle support, while the control group received usual care only.
  • Outcome measures included quality of life, anxiety, depression, anger, disease knowledge, C-reactive protein, and immunoglobulin G.
  • Quality of life improved in both groups, with a statistically significant benefit in the intervention group.
  • The intervention group showed larger reductions in anxiety, depression, and anger compared to the control.
  • Exploratory findings suggested larger reductions in C-reactive protein and immunoglobulin G in the intervention group.

Abstract

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) often experience psychological distress and reduced quality of life (QoL), but evidence for teach-back–based education in MM is limited. We tested a teach-back–centered multidimensional intervention in hospitalized patients. This single-center prospective controlled study enrolled 195 inpatients. The intervention group (n = 101) received teach-back–guided disease education plus psychological and lifestyle support, in addition to usual care. Controls (n = 94) received usual care alone. Outcomes included QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30), anxiety, depression, anger, disease knowledge, C-reactive protein (CRP), and immunoglobulin G (IgG). Linear mixed-effects models estimated group differences; Hedges g was reported. QoL improved in both groups, with an additional benefit in the intervention group (Time×Group β = 0.705; 95% CI 0.261–1.149; P = 0.004; Hedges g = 0.251). Anxiety, depression, and anger decreased in both groups; the intervention group showed larger reductions in anxiety (β = −0.173; 95% CI − 0.341 to − 0.006; P = 0.009; g = − 0.117), depression (β = −0.177; 95% CI − 0.352 to − 0.003; P = 0.046; g = − 0.112), and anger (β = −0.567; 95% CI − 0.732 to − 0.002; P = 0.038; g = − 0.682). Disease knowledge increased without a between-group difference (β = 0.183; P = 0.657). Exploratory analyses suggested larger reductions in CRP (β = −3.442; 95% CI − 6.296 to − 1.411; P = 0.014) and IgG (β = −0.632; 95% CI − 0.988 to − 0.276; P = 0.043). A teach-back centred multidimensional intervention improved QoL and emotional outcomes beyond usual care. The observed between-group differences in CRP and IgG were exploratory associations. Future multicentre randomised studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the durability and generalisability of the QoL and emotional benefits observed in this study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b71b85696592c86eb175https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-026-02873-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper