PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Statistics & Probability Letters0 citationsOpen Access

Wilks confidence regions for empirical weighted quantiles

View Full Paper
MAM. AlloucheEGE. Gobet

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a theoretical framework for weighted quantiles and their applications in statistical inference.
  • Establishing a multivariate central limit theorem for multiple perturbed weighted quantiles.
  • Deriving a distribution-free confidence interval for weighted quantiles.
  • Providing Wilks confidence bounds for the weighted expected shortfall.
  • Introduced a multivariate central limit theorem for weighted empirical quantiles.
  • Derived asymptotically distribution-free confidence intervals for weighted quantiles.
  • Found that scenarios with heavier tails typically deviate from the target significance level.

Abstract

Quantiles are fundamental tools in statistics and risk analysis. While asymptotic and finite-sample results for standard empirical quantiles are well established, analogous results for weighted quantiles remain scarce. In this paper, we establish a comprehensive asymptotic theory for weighted quantiles. We derive a multivariate central limit theorem for multiple perturbed weighted quantiles. This result yields, as corollaries, (i) a multivariate CLT for weighted empirical quantiles, (ii) an asymptotically distribution-free confidence interval for weighted quantiles in the spirit of Wilks’ method, and (iii) Wilks confidence bounds for the weighted expected shortfall. Our theoretical contributions are also supported by numerical experiments, which code is publicly available at https://github.com/michael-allouche/confidence-region-weighted-quantile . • Wilks confidence regions for empirical weighted quantiles. • Multivariate central limit theorem for weighted quantiles. • Distribution-free confidence interval for univariate weighted quantile. • Confidence bounds for the weighted expected shortfall. • Scenarios with the heaviest tails are in average further away from the target significance level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Allouche et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b71b85696592c86eb240https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2026.110795
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper