PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Medizinische Genetik0 citationsOpen Access

Indication and diagnostic method selection for invasive prenatal genetic testing – review of the literature and conclusions of the Austrian consensus conference on prenatal genetic testing

SVSarah VerheyenBPBarbara PertlSBSophie Bierbaumer

Key Points

  • The aim is to clarify the use of genetic diagnostics in prenatal testing and address uncertainty in clinical practice.
  • Reviewed existing guidelines and recommendations on prenatal genetic testing.
  • Facilitated a consensus among a working group addressing key clinical questions.
  • Focused on a phenotype-driven approach for testing in cases of fetal pathologies.
  • Recommended using chromosomal microarray, exome, and genome analysis for diagnosing fetal conditions.
  • Highlighted the limited predictive value of genetic findings in normal fetuses.
  • Established a consensus to enhance the consistency of prenatal diagnostics in Austria.

Abstract

Abstract The increasing availability of chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome and genome analysis for prenatal diagnostic testing, together with concerns of potential legal consequences in cases of missed diagnoses, has contributed to substantial uncertainty in prenatal medicine. To support consistent and clinically meaningful use of genetic diagnostics in Austria, the working group for prenatal genetic diagnostics reviewed existing guidelines and recommendations and agreed on a consensus addressing eight key questions arising from clinical practice. Given the limited predictive value of genomic findings in structurally normal fetuses, the working group recommends a strictly phenotype-driven diagnostic approach with CMA, exome and genome analysis to be systematically offered in the presence of fetal pathologies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Verheyen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b80e85696592c86eb7a5https://doi.org/10.1515/medgen-2026-2012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Imprinting Disorders and Epigenetic Alterations in Children Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Mechanisms, Clinical Outcomes, and Prenatal Diagnosis2025 · 6 citations
  2. 2Guidelines for NGS procedures applied to prenatal diagnosis by the Spanish Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Spanish Association of Prenatal Diagnosis2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database2019 · 1,857 citations
  4. 4Epidemiology of fragile X syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis2014 · 467 citations
  5. 5Clinical utility of trio whole exome sequencing in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies2025 · 6 citations