PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Anaesthesia and Intensive Care0 citationsOpen Access

Choosing reusable operating theatre devices at an Australian health service avoids hundreds of tonnes of waste and could save millions of dollars per annum

View Full Paper
JDJessica F DaviesEHElizabeth HuSBStephanie Best

Key Points

  • The aim was to assess the environmental and financial impacts of single-use medical devices compared to reusable alternatives.
  • Conducted a retrospective audit of procurement data across two hospitals
  • Examined quantities, costs, and environmental impacts of single-use devices
  • Analyzed data from 19 operating theatres and five endoscopy procedure rooms over five years.
  • 2,683,412 single-use devices purchased and disposed over five years
  • Combined mass of 748 tons and approximate cost of A$17.3 million for procurement and disposal
  • Estimated 3,690 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions associated with these devices.

Abstract

Healthcare services rely on large amounts of disposable medical devices, even though similar reusable devices exist. This retrospective audit of operating theatre and endoscopy procurement data across two hospitals aimed to examine the number and mass of simple single-use devices and cost (purchasing and disposal) of such devices in operating theatres where a reusable device alternative exists. This was assessed at one health service across two hospitals with a total of 19 operating theatres and five endoscopy procedure rooms. The main outcome was the number of single-use devices procured and disposed of, mass of devices procured, cost of procurement, cost of disposal, and estimated environmental impact of device procurement and disposal. In a five-year period of operating at two hospitals, 2, 683, 412 simple single-use devices that have a reusable alternative were purchased and disposed of, with a combined mass of 748 t, an approximate purchasing cost of A16. 1m, and an approximate disposal cost of around A1. 2m. The associated environmental impact of these devices was estimated at 3690 tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent. Simple disposable medical devices in operating theatres such as bowls, jugs, drapes, gowns, scissors, towels and anaesthesia equipment produce tonnes of waste per annum, cost millions to procure and dispose of, and produce greenhouse gas emissions from production to disposal. Replacing some single-use devices with reusable alternatives presents an opportunity for health services to save money from purchasing and disposing of single-use devices, as well as reducing their waste and greenhouse gas footprint. Replacing disposable equipment with reusable equipment can divert tonnes of waste from landfill and save on procurement and disposal costs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Davies et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b85585696592c86eb94ahttps://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x261428146
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The carbon footprint of Australian health care2018 · 536 citations
  2. 2The direct environmental impact of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a surgical waste audit of five cases2016 · 48 citations
  3. 3Correction to: Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries2023 · 11 citations
  4. 4Environmental and economic comparison of reusable and disposable blood pressure cuffs in multiple clinical settings2020 · 73 citations
  5. 5Reusable versus single-use ICU equipment: what’s the environmental footprint?2023 · 31 citations