PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026International Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Optimal adjuvant strategy in intermediate-risk cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AYAkira YokoiHMHiroko MachidaMOMika Okazawa‐Sakai

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the efficacy and safety of various adjuvant treatments following radical hysterectomy in patients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on adjuvant treatment strategies.
  • Reviewed studies comparing radiotherapy, no further treatment, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy after surgery.
  • Searched multiple databases to identify relevant studies involving patient outcomes and treatment efficacy.
  • Radiotherapy improved recurrence-free survival compared to no further treatment (HR 0.61).
  • Radiotherapy did not significantly enhance overall survival compared to no further treatment (HR 0.77).
  • Radiotherapy showed fewer grade ≥ 3 toxicities compared to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (odds ratio 0.25).

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant treatment strategies following radical hysterectomy for intermediate-risk, early-stage cervical cancer using a reconstructed HR Hazard ratio (HR) meta-analysis. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology Cervical Cancer Committee. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Ichushi were searched on July 29, 2025, using “cervical cancer,” “intermediate-risk,” and “adjuvant therapy.” Studies comparing adjuvant radiotherapy alone (RT) with no further treatment (NFT), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), or systemic chemotherapy (CT) after conventional radical hysterectomy were independently reviewed by two reviewers. Primary outcomes were survival and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicities. Results Of 402 screened articles, 24 studies comprising 9278 patients were included: RT ( n = 4167), NFT ( n = 2057), CCRT ( n = 2118), and CT ( n = 936). The majority of studies enrolled patients with ≥ 2 Sedlis risk factors (median 84.2%, interquartile range 44.7–100%). Compared with NFT, RT significantly improved recurrence-free survival (HR 0.61, P 0.05). Grade ≥ 3 toxicities were significantly lower with RT than with CCRT (odds ratio 0.25; P < 0.001). Conclusion Adjuvant RT represents an effective and well-tolerated postoperative strategy for intermediate-risk, early-stage cervical cancer. Adjuvant CT may represent a potential alternative option.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yokoi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b8d485696592c86ebed9https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-026-03028-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper