PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology0 citations

Accessibility Issue Detection and Repair in Mobile Applications: A Systematic Literature Review

View Full Paper
ZLZhenyu LiuDYDengfeng YaoHLHongzhe Liu

Key Points

  • To synthesize advancements in mobile application accessibility issue detection and repair techniques.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Analyzed 76 high-quality studies across nine major databases.
  • Categorized accessibility issues into perceptibility, operability, understandability, and robustness.
  • Identified a shift in detection techniques from static analysis to deep learning and semantic reasoning.
  • Proposed a taxonomy for repair approaches including rule-driven, learning-based, and LLM-assisted methods.
  • Noted high false-positive rates in detection and a gap in repair depth versus detection breadth.

Abstract

Mobile application accessibility is crucial for digital inclusion. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) following PRISMA guidelines, synthesizing advancements in accessibility issue detection and repair techniques. We analyze representative mobile accessibility tools and industrial practices to complement SLR evidence. Nine major databases (ACM DL, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Wiley, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, arXiv) were searched, with 76 high-quality studies published up to July 2025 analyzed. Common accessibility issues are categorized into four types—perceptibility, operability, understandability, and robustness—aligning with user capability modeling. In accessibility issue detection, evolution from static analysis to deep learning and large language models (LLMs) has shifted research from rule-based matching to semantic reasoning, enhancing automation and generalization. However, detection and repair remain loosely coupled and fragmented, with high false-positive rates and weak inter-module feedback loops. For repair, we propose a taxonomy of rule-driven, learning-based, and LLM-assisted approaches, revealing a gap between detection breadth and repair research depth. LLMs show potential for semantic understanding, issue reasoning, and repair generation, paving the way toward intelligent agents for accessibility. Looking ahead, future research should focus on semantic-enhanced detection, multimodal repair, refined user capability modeling, and unified evaluation standards—collectively advancing accessibility engineering toward an accessibility-by-default design paradigm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b95b85696592c86ec198https://doi.org/10.1145/3809496
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1MotorEase: Automated Detection of Motor Impairment Accessibility Issues in Mobile App UIs2024 · 16 citations
  2. 2Assessing Accessibility Levels in Mobile Applications Developed from Figma Templates2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3UISGPT: Automated Mobile UI Design Smell Detection with Large Language Models2024 · 8 citations
  4. 4Towards a User-Centred Systematic Review Service: The Transformative Power of Service Design Thinking2020 · 39 citations
  5. 5User Experience Oriented Software Interface Design of Handheld Mobile Devices2010 · 9 citations