PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026JRSM Cardiovascular Disease0 citations

Electrical cardioversion in patients with left ventricular thrombus: A systematic review of safety and thromboembolic risk

View Full Paper
CSCarlson SamaMCMuchi Ditah ChobufoAAAdemola Ajibade

Key Result

Electrical cardioversion in 68 patients with known left ventricular thrombus resulted in 0 clinically apparent thromboembolic events over 3 months to 1 year of follow-up.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the thromboembolic risk associated with electrical cardioversion in patients with imaging-documented left ventricular thrombus.
  • Performed a systematic review of studies from PubMed and Scopus
  • Included only retrospective studies focusing on electrical cardioversion outcomes
  • Examined outcomes of anticoagulation practices and thromboembolic events
  • Three studies reviewed involved 68 patients with documented LV thrombus
  • No thromboembolic events directly attributable to cardioversion were reported
  • About 21% of patients had no anticoagulation before procedure, varying anticoagulation practices observed

Study Design

Type

Systematic Review (n=68)

Structured PICO

Does electrical cardioversion cause clinically apparent thromboembolic complications in patients with imaging-documented left ventricular thrombus?

P
Population
68 patients with known, imaging-proven left ventricular (LV) thrombus from 3 retrospective studies
I
Intervention
External direct-current cardioversion or internal/intra-procedural electrical shocks
O
Outcome
Clinically apparent thromboembolic complicationssafety

Available limited evidence suggests that electrical cardioversion in patients with known LV thrombus does not result in clinically overt thromboembolic events.

Limitations

  • Limited available evidence
  • limited evidence
  • retrospective studies

Abstract

Background The thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion in patients with left-ventricular (LV) thrombus is poorly defined, producing variable clinical practice. We performed a systematic review to synthesize reported thromboembolic outcomes after cardioversion in patients with imaging-documented LV thrombus. Methods We searched PubMed and Scopus through 25 July 2025 for studies reporting outcomes after external direct-current cardioversion or internal/intra-procedural electrical shocks in patients with known LV thrombus. Case reports and pharmacological cardioversion studies were excluded. The primary outcome was clinically apparent thromboembolic complications. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively. Results Three retrospective studies met criteria, comprising 68 patients with known, imaging-proven LV thrombus. Thrombus morphology was predominantly laminated/fixed, but about 8% of patients had mobile thrombi in one series. Anticoagulation practices varied; a subset (21%) had no anticoagulation prior to electrical cardioversion. In total, 60 patients underwent direct-current cardioversion while eight patients underwent multiple internal intra-procedural cardioversions in the setting of known LV thrombus. Overall, no thromboembolic events directly attributable to cardioversion were observed over a follow-up period of 3 months to 1 year. Conclusion Available evidence, although limited, did not identify clinically overt thromboembolic events after electrical cardioversion in patients with known LV thrombus. Decisions should, however, be individualized, imaging-guided, accompanied by optimized anticoagulation whenever possible and multidisciplinary discussions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sama et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Left ventricular thrombus (n=68). Electrical cardioversion was evaluated on Clinically apparent thromboembolic complications. Electrical cardioversion in 68 patients with known left ventricular thrombus resulted in 0 clinically apparent thromboembolic events over 3 months to 1 year of follow-up.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b9a285696592c86ec3dchttps://doi.org/10.1177/20480040261445487
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Safety evaluation of electrical cardioversion in the presence left ventricular thrombus2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion in patients with cardiogenic shock2025
  3. 3Predictors of Left Atrial Thrombus and Short-Term Recurrence of Arrhythmia in Patients Undergoing Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation, a Single-Centre Experience2017
  4. 4Cardiovascular Events of Electrical Cardioversion Under Optimal Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: The Multicenter Analysis2015 · 15 citations
  5. 5Clinical Assessment of Thromboembolic Risk in Patients Undergoing Elective Electrical Cardioversion with or Without Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Real-World Observational Study2026