PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Hepatitis C distribution across diverse population groups in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: An umbrella review

View Full Paper
ZAZahra AbdolahiniaSESana EybpooshPAParya Jangipour Afshar

Key Points

  • This review aims to summarize the prevalence of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) across different population groups in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.
  • Conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses on HCV prevalence.
  • Searched multiple databases including PubMed and Scopus to gather comprehensive data.
  • Pooled estimates calculated using a random-effects model, focusing on four key population groups.
  • Key populations showed a pooled HCV prevalence of 31.0%, with similar rates among co-infected patients.
  • Clinical exposure risk populations had a prevalence of 28.0%, while the apparently healthy population had a low prevalence of 2.0%.
  • Post-2015, prevalence among clinically exposed populations declined significantly, indicating effective interventions.

Abstract

Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a major public health challenge in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), with prevalence varying across population groups. This umbrella review summarizes the distribution of HCV infection across diverse populations in the region. Methods We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses reporting HCV prevalence in the EMR. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Iranian databases, including Magiran and the Scientific Information Database (SID), were searched. Google Scholar was additionally screened to ensure comprehensive coverage. Pooled estimates were extracted across four population groups: apparently healthy individuals; those with clinical or healthcare-associated exposure risk; patients co-infected with hepatitis viruses or other liver-related diseases; and key populations at increased risk (groups disproportionately affected due to their behaviors and higher vulnerability). For time-period analyses, meta-analyses were grouped into two intervals (before 2015 vs. 2015 and after) based on the median year of data collection of primary studies. Pooled prevalence was calculated using a random-effects model in STATA version 17. Results A total of 55 meta-analyses were included. The pooled HCV prevalence was 31.0% (95% CI: 27.0–38.0) among key populations, and also 31.0% (95% CI: 12.0–49.0) among patients co-infected with other hepatitis viruses or liver-related diseases. Those with clinical or healthcare-associated exposure risk showed a prevalence of 28.0% (95% CI: 23.0–32.0), whereas the apparently healthy population had the lowest prevalence at 2.0% (95% CI: 1.0–2.0). Subgroup analysis indicated a decline in prevalence among clinically exposed populations after 2015, from 29% to 10%, coinciding with the direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and strengthened infection-control practices. The highest prevalence was observed among key populations in Libya, healthcare-exposed populations in Morocco, and apparently healthy individuals in Egypt. Conclusion Variation in HCV prevalence across populations in the EMR highlights the need for population-specific strategies to support progress toward World Health Organization elimination targets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abdolahinia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9baa885696592c86ecc93https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346782
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper