GUT Threshold Corrections — The Minimal SU (5) Limit: The threshold coefficients are too small. Minimal SU (5) is disfavored. This paper is part of the HOWL research archive—a collection of physics papers exploring integer fraction derivations across multiple domains using exact arithmetic and automated comparison. Abstract The two-loop running of the gauge couplings with the Cabibbo Doublet modified betas leaves a residual unification miss Delta = −0. 40 (PHYS-24, PHYS-28). This paper computes the GUT threshold corrections in minimal SU (5) that could close this residual. In minimal SU (5), the superheavy spectrum has three components: the X, Y gauge bosons defining MGUT, the colored Higgs triplet T (3, 1, −1/3) with beta shift db₃ = 1/12, and the Sigma field remnants — an (8, 1, 0) color octet with db₃ = 1/2 and a (1, 3, 0) weak triplet with db₂ = 1/3. The threshold correction to Delta is deltaDelta = − (1/12) ln (MT/MX) / (2π) − (1/6) ln (MSigma/MX) / (2π). The combined coefficient Cₜotal = −1/4. All coefficients are exact Fractions from representation theory. To close Delta = −0. 40, even the best case (triplet and Sigma at the same mass below MX) requires MX/M = 23, 228 — a mass splitting far beyond natural. The abort test fires: minimal SU (5) is disfavored as the GUT completion. The Cabibbo Doublet representation (3, 2, 1/6) and its Level 1 arithmetic survive intact — they are independent of the GUT completion. The proton lifetime prediction (10³4. 5 yr) is unchanged. Falsification Criteria All papers in this archive are subject to falsification through direct comparison to published experimental measurements. Each derived value is tested against independent data with explicit PASS/FAIL criteria. Any derived value that fails its comparison is documented and published alongside the successes. Research Context This archive documents an ongoing research program in integer fraction physics. The methodology is: derive values from gauge group integers using exact fraction arithmetic, compare to published measurements, and document all results including failures. The archive spans multiple physics domains connected through the soliton boundary framework described in the constituent papers. Package Contents manuscript. md: The complete derivation and supporting analysis. README. md: Navigation, dependencies, and citation (Registry: HOWL-PHYS-29-2026). Dependencies: HOWL-PHYS-1-2026, HOWL-PHYS-13-2026, HOWL-PHYS-21-2026, HOWL-PHYS-24-2026, HOWL-PHYS-25-2026, HOWL-PHYS-26-2026, HOWL-PHYS-27-2026, HOWL-PHYS-28-2026 Motto: Derive. Compare. Publish. Status: Complete
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Geoffrey Howland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Geoffrey Howland (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9baeb85696592c86ecd4e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19666420
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: