PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026BDJ Open0 citationsOpen Access

Brain parcellation for TMD neuroimaging: a critical narrative review

NSNatalia SavychukVPVasyl PekhnoАЛАнастасія Ляховська

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate modern brain mapping techniques and identify effective parcellation schemes for TMD neuroimaging.
  • Conducted a comprehensive search of scientific literature across multiple databases.
  • Applied PRISMA guidelines to screen 689 records, ultimately including 46 studies for qualitative analysis.
  • Compared various anatomical and functional atlases for their compatibility with fMRI and DTI.
  • Identified critical parcellation schemes that enhance mapping accuracy for TMD neuroimaging.
  • Recommended a combination of HCP-MMP1.0, SUIT, and specialized brainstem atlases for optimal standardization.
  • Highlighted the relevance of cortical, subcortical, and brainstem structures in TMD research.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To analyze modern brain mapping for neurobiological mechanisms of temporomandibular disorders, with particular emphasis on structural and functional alterations, employing advanced neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI and DTI. Furthermore, this study aims to identify the most appropriate combination of brain parcellation schemes that comprehensively cover cortical, subcortical, and brainstem structures to enhance the accuracy and standardization of neuroimaging protocols in TMD research. Methods Scientific sources were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar as of 29.06.2025, 689 records were identified for PRISMA workflow, of which 676 records remained for screening after the removing duplicates and irrelevant items, 630 records were excluded per prespecified criteria (inappropriate diagnoses, insufficiently described rapid studies, metabolic disorders), and 46 studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Results We compare anatomical, functional, and multimodal atlases (Desikan–Killiany, Destrieux, Schaefer, HCP-MMP1.0, Brainnetome, SUIT, Brainstem atlases) in terms of fMRI/DTI compatibility and relevance of regions of interest. Conclusions The authors suggest that the use of a combined parcellation scheme: HCP-MMP1.0 for the highly detailed cortex, SUIT for the cerebellum, specialized brainstem atlases—which cover corticocortical, cerebellar, and brainstem connections—increases mapping accuracy and meets modern requirements for the standardization of neuroimaging protocols in studies of the TMD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Savychuk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9bb6285696592c86ed218https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-026-00407-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper