PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 20260 citationsOpen Access

CRITICAL-PROPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF LOGICAL SUBSTANTIVALISM: Hugang Cui's Track-Light Model in Confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

View Full Paper
VCVidamor CabannasDSDenivaldo Silva

Key Points

  • The study aims to critically evaluate the compatibility of Hugang Cui's Track-Light Model with the Theory of Objectivity.
  • Conducted a propositional and ontological analysis of Cui's model
  • Investigated key dimensions such as individuation and the mind-body dualism
  • Articulated Cui’s model within the context of recent developments in modal ontology
  • Cui's model is philosophically significant but only partially aligns with the Theory of Objectivity.
  • Decisive tensions were identified regarding the role of infinity and the need for a transcendent substance.
  • The analysis suggests a high-level relevance of Cui's model to the aims of the Theory of Objectivity.

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Hugang Cui’s Spacetime Substantivalism 0: The Track-Light Model — The Logic Matrix as the Universal Source, the Origin of the Cosmic Singularity, and a New Foundation for Metaphysics in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Written from the modal, ontological, and cosmological perspective of TO, the study investigates the extent to which Cui’s Logical Matrix , generative meta-law, and account of matter, life, and consciousness can be considered compatible with the Seven Absolute Truths of the Theory of Objectivity. The article argues that Cui’s proposal is philosophically significant because it restores logical-ontological anteriority to the center of metaphysical reflection and seeks to overcome the mind-body dualism through a common source. At the same time, the study identifies decisive tensions between Cui’s logical substantivalism and the modal discipline of TO, especially regarding individuation, boundary lines, minimal relational observation, the role of infinity as non-element, and the need for a transcendent substance beyond the quantum domain. The text further articulates Cui’s model with the foundational bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, its recent developments on modal ontology, testability, phenomenic elements, inductive effects, and cosmogonic structure, as well as with supporting works in philosophy, cosmology, consciousness studies, and artificial intelligence. The article concludes that Cui’s model should be regarded as a high-level logicist interlocutor: genuinely relevant to the philosophical aims of TO, yet only partially compatible with its full modal and cosmogonic framework. Editorial note: This analytical study benefited from the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Hugang Cui; Logical Matrix; Track-Light Model; logical substantivalism; modal ontology; cosmology; mind-body problem; consciousness studies; cosmogony; metaphysics; phenomenic elements; inductive effects; artificial intelligence; philosophy of physics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cabannas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9bb6285696592c86ed25ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19679939
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper