PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Electronic Markets0 citationsOpen Access

Service through communication—Conceptualizing service systems with Luhmann’s systems theory

DBDaniel BeverungenJPJens PoeppelbussSHSimon Hemmrich

Key Points

  • To establish a theoretical foundation for service systems using Luhmann's systems theory, addressing conceptual ambiguity.
  • Propose Luhmann's systems theory as a theoretical framework for service systems.
  • Derive five theoretical propositions to clarify service systems and related constructs.
  • Explore dynamic service phenomena and institutional arrangements through this lens.
  • Clarified the conceptual ambiguity of service systems within the interdisciplinary scope.
  • Highlighted the role of communication in value co-creation in service systems.
  • Provided a robust framework for advancing research in service ecosystems.

Abstract

Abstract Service research has evolved into an interdisciplinary research field that bridges diverse disciplines, including information systems (IS) and marketing. Nearly two decades ago, the service system concept was introduced as a foundational abstraction in service research, drawing on ideas from the service-dominant logic (S-D logic) of marketing. Despite its widespread adoption in service research, particularly in the IS discipline, the service system concept lacks a solid theoretical foundation. This has resulted in conceptual ambiguity and overlap with related constructs, such as service ecosystems. Moreover, it has largely remained a static analytical lens, insufficiently capturing dynamic service phenomena, including value co-creation and co-destruction, as well as the emergence of institutional arrangements. To address these limitations, we propose Luhmann’s systems theory (LST) as a robust framework for conceptualizing service systems as autopoietic (self-creating) systems, in which communication serves as the fundamental mechanism that drives value co-creation. We derive five theoretical propositions from this re-conceptualization that clarify conceptual ambiguity and allow researchers to explore dynamic service phenomena in greater depth. Given LST’s general approach, our conceptualization provides a theoretically grounded, interdisciplinary foundation for advancing service research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Beverungen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9bc1285696592c86ed4a4https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-026-00889-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper