PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Geoforum0 citationsOpen Access

Hybrid governance and competing agendas: analysing anti-trafficking approaches in urban India

View Full Paper
JNJaffer Latief Najar

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore hybrid governance in anti-trafficking efforts involving multiple actors in Sonagachi, Kolkata.
  • Focused on local dynamics within Sonagachi, Kolkata's urban sex work neighborhood.
  • Analyzed collaborations among street-level bureaucrats, NGOs, and community collectives.
  • Discussed the participatory approach of the sex worker community in response to anti-trafficking governance.
  • Identified that hybrid governance accommodates community-led initiatives while facing legal and ideological challenges.
  • Revealed ongoing socio-economic hierarchies and marginalization of sex workers.
  • Demonstrated how these dynamics reproduce existing power relations in society.

Abstract

This article develops attention to the local dynamics and hybrid form of anti-trafficking governance by focusing on multiple governing actors in Sonagachi, Kolkata, India. Sonagachi is one of the largest urban sex work neighbourhoods in Asia/India and is a prime location for involvement of several anti-trafficking actors such as Street-level Bureaucrats, (I)NGOs, and Community Led Collectives. This article discusses how street-level bureaucrats collaborate with national and international NGOs and other actors to govern human trafficking, notwithstanding the ensuing difficulties for the individuals targeted and for consenting adult sex workers. The article also describes a self-regulatory governance approach developed by the sex worker community in response to ongoing anti-trafficking governance collaboration between government and (I)NGOs. This approach and, particularly, its ground-up participatory governance, has contributed to shape the lives and conditions of migrant sex workers in Sonagachi. While this localized hybrid governance offers certain advantages, such as enabling and accommodating community-led regulation and initiatives, amid criminalization of sex work, it remains constricted by legal ambiguity, ideological contestation, and uneven power relations as well as social hierarchies. The findings underlines that hybrid governance does not put an end to structural susceptibilities, socio-economic hierarchies and power relations but regularly reproduces them, particularly along lines of caste, class, religion, political interests/ideologies, and migration status, thereby continuing the marginalization of sex workers within broader social, political, and legal landscapes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jaffer Latief Najar (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb084f553a5433e34b35f0https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104675
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exploring the Invisible Trade: A Case Study of an NGO's Anti-Trafficking Efforts and Challenges in Assam’s Cachar District2025
  2. 2Reforming Rescue: A Critical Examination of India's Anti-Trafficking Legislation from a Victim-Centered Perspective2025
  3. 3Sex Work Trafficking and Social Acceptance: The State versus Local Perception2024
  4. 4The <i>Homo Sacer</i> : sex work and the politics of legal abandonment in postcolonial India2026
  5. 5HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN INDIA: LEGAL FRAMEWORKS, CHALLENGES, AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS2025