PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026ACTA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOCHEMICA0 citationsOpen Access

Semantic Segmentation for Pixel-Wise Visualization of Breast Cancer in Deep Ultraviolet-Excited Fluorescence Images

View Full Paper
TMTomoya MatsuiRNRyuta NakaoSTShunsuke Tomimoto

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the effectiveness of deep learning semantic segmentation for detecting breast cancer in MUSE images.
  • Utilized fresh breast tissues stained with terbium and Hoechst and imaged using MUSE.
  • Developed models using a dataset of cancerous and non-cancerous images with five-fold nested cross-validation.
  • Applied sliding window-based majority voting for post-processing to enhance model accuracy.
  • The cancer-only model achieved a Dice score of 0.7478, outperforming the cancer plus non-cancer model (0.7343).
  • Post-processing improved Dice scores significantly, with the cancer-only model reaching 0.7984.
  • The findings confirm the viability of deep learning for effective breast cancer visualization in MUSE images.

Abstract

Microscopy with ultraviolet surface excitation (MUSE) enables rapid fluorescence imaging of tissue surfaces, but MUSE images differ markedly from conventional hematoxylin and eosin images, making cancer delineation challenging for routine pathological practice. We investigated the feasibility of deep learning-based semantic segmentation, which assigns a class label to each pixel, for pixel-wise breast cancer detection in MUSE images. Fresh breast tis‍sues from 30 mastectomy patients with breast cancer were stained with terbium and Hoechst and imaged by MUSE. A total of 150 cancerous images (five per case) were manually annotated into cancerous and non-cancerous classes, and 300 non-cancerous images (ten per case) were collected. Models were trained and evaluated using five-fold nested cross-validation, comparing a cancer-only (CO) model trained solely on cancerous images with a cancer plus non-cancer (CN) model trained on both cancerous and non-cancerous images. The CO model achieved a higher Dice score than the CN model (CO, 0.7478; CN, 0.7343). Sliding window-based majority voting post-processing reduced scattered false-positive areas and improved Dice scores (CO, 0.7984; CN, 0.7849). These results support the feasibility of deep learning-based semantic segmentation for visualizing breast cancer regions and provide a basis for future quantitative applications using MUSE images.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Matsui et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb084f553a5433e34b36e8https://doi.org/10.1267/ahc.26-00007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper