PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026International Microbiology0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative evaluation of quercetin, rutin, and their nanoparticles: enhanced antimicrobial and antioxidant activities

SASardar AliAKAmir KhanMKMajid Khan

Key Points

  • This research evaluates the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of quercetin and rutin in both unprocessed and nanoparticle forms.
  • Nanoparticles were prepared and characterized using dynamic light scattering, scanning electron microscopy, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.
  • Antimicrobial activity was tested against various bacterial and fungal strains.
  • Antioxidant activity was measured and compared between quercetin and rutin.
  • Rutin nanoparticles were significantly smaller (98.76 nm) compared to unprocessed rutin (181.7 nm).
  • Quercetin nanoparticles showed improved antimicrobial activity with more zones of inhibition against tested strains compared to unprocessed forms and standard drugs.
  • Quercetin exhibited stronger antioxidant activity than rutin.

Abstract

Recent advances in nanoparticle (NP) technology have significantly improved the bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy of bioactive compounds. This study investigates the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of quercetin and rutin in unprocessed (UP) and nanoparticle forms. Nanoparticles were prepared and characterized using dynamic light scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Particle size analysis showed a substantial reduction, with rutin NPs measuring 98.76 nm compared to 181.7 nm (UP), and quercetin NPs measuring 91.28 nm compared to 185.8 nm (UP). Polydispersity index values 0.24 for rutin and 0.21 for quercetin indicated narrow size distribution and good homogeneity. Zeta potential values of − 28.6 mV (rutin) and − 30.2 mV (quercetin) confirmed adequate electrostatic stabilization and colloidal stability. SEM analysis revealed that NP formulations exhibited more uniform, smaller, and less crystalline morphology compared to UP forms, consistent with DLS findings. FTIR spectra confirmed the retention of characteristic functional groups, indicating no chemical modification and good compatibility. Furthermore, biological evaluation demonstrated significantly enhanced antimicrobial activity of NP formulations against bacterial strains, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella flexneri, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Salmonella typhi, as well as fungal pathogens such as Trichophyton longifusas, Aspergillus flavus, Microsporum canis, Fusarium solani, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata. Nanoparticles showed more zones of inhibition and lower minimum inhibitory concentrations compared to UP forms and standard drugs Cefazolin and Kanamycin (p-value < 0.01). In antioxidant assays, quercetin exhibited stronger activity than rutin. Overall, nanoformulations improved in vitro bioactivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ali et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0899553a5433e34b38e7https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-026-00816-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Antibacterial activity of medicinal plants and their role in wound healing2024 · 25 citations
  2. 2New Perspectives of Antimicrobials from Marine Environment in the Treatment of Non-healing Foot Wounds of Diabetics.2025 · 3 citations
  3. 3Chemical Basis of Interactions Between Engineered Nanoparticles and Biological Systems2014 · 670 citations
  4. 4Antivirulence activities of Rutin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles against pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus2024 · 30 citations
  5. 5Rutin-Loaded Nanovesicles for Improved Stability and Enhanced Topical Efficacy of Natural Compound2021 · 44 citations