PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Embolic Agent Selection and Outcomes in Renal Angiomyolipoma Embolisation

View Full Paper
RORoss O'SheaHPHimanshu PendseKHKevin Ho

Key Result

Liquid embolic agents for renal angiomyolipoma embolisation achieved the greatest tumour reduction with low re-intervention rates, while coil-only embolisation showed inferior outcomes.

Key Points

  • This research focuses on comparing the effectiveness of different embolic agents for treating renal angiomyolipoma.
  • Examined treatment outcomes of various embolic agents in renal angiomyolipoma cases.
  • Compared efficacy and re-intervention rates of liquid embolic agents versus coil-only embolisation.
  • Liquid embolic agents resulted in the highest tumour reduction rates.
  • Coil-only embolisation showed inferior outcomes and increased re-intervention rates.

Structured PICO

Do liquid embolic agents improve tumour reduction and reduce re-intervention rates compared to coil-only embolisation in patients with renal angiomyolipoma?

P
Population
Patients with renal angiomyolipoma (r-AML) undergoing selective arterial embolisation (SAE)
I
Intervention
Liquid embolic agents
C
Comparator
Coil-only embolisation
O
Outcome
Tumour reduction and re-intervention rates

Liquid embolic agents are superior to coil-only embolisation for achieving tumour reduction and minimizing re-intervention in the treatment of renal angiomyolipoma.

Abstract

SAE is a safe and effective treatment for r-AML in both elective and emergency settings. Liquid embolic agents achieved the greatest tumour reduction with low re-intervention rates, while coil-only embolisation showed inferior outcomes and should be avoided where possible.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

O'Shea et al. (2026) studied this question. Liquid embolic agents for renal angiomyolipoma embolisation achieved the greatest tumour reduction with low re-intervention rates, while coil-only embolisation showed inferior outcomes.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb08ef553a5433e34b3a38https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.70108
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper