PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Journal of Primary Health Care1 citationsOpen Access

Factors influencing needle-length selection for adult deltoid intramuscular vaccination: an online survey of New Zealand vaccinators’ practice

View Full Paper
SRSally B. RoseCTCarmen Timu-ParataGPGeorge Parker

Key Points

  • This study aims to investigate how well vaccinators understand and apply needle-length guidelines, particularly for big-bodied individuals.
  • Conducted an anonymous online survey with New Zealand vaccinators to assess their awareness and practices regarding needle length.
  • Collected data on demographics, education about needle-length guidance, and barriers to using longer needles.
  • Analyzed the data using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods.
  • 70% of respondents were aware of needle-length guidance, but only 48.5% received specific education about longer needles.
  • 60% reported having used a 38 mm needle; however, only 26% used it frequently in the past year for eligible individuals.
  • Key barriers included limited availability of longer needles, information gaps, and uncertainty about who qualifies for their use.

Abstract

Introduction Data from Aotearoa–New Zealand’s 2021 COVID-19 mass vaccination programme revealed underutilisation of longer 38 mm needles, which are recommended for big-bodied people. This raises health equity concerns because correct needle length is necessary to achieve intramuscular vaccine delivery. Aim This study aimed to explore vaccinators’ awareness and implementation of needle-length guidance, and to identify barriers and enablers to use of long needles for big-bodied people in New Zealand. Method Between August and October 2025, an anonymous online survey was distributed to vaccinators in New Zealand through professional organisations with links to vaccinator health professionals. Data collection included demographics, education received on needle-length guidance, barriers and enablers to use of 38 mm long needles, and opportunities to support future practice. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics, and comments summarised using a qualitative descriptive approach. Results Of 196 respondents, 70% were aware of needle-length guidance and 48.5% recalled receipt of specific information or education about using longer needles. In total, 60% had ever used a 38 mm needle, but only 26% had used a longer needle for at least half of those they thought eligible in the past 12 months. Key barriers to long needle use included supply of vaccines with shorter needle lengths attached, information gaps and uncertainty in determining eligibility for a 38 mm long needle. A total of 62% saw a need for strategies to strengthen their implementation of needle-length guidance. Discussion A range of strategies need to be implemented across multiple levels (from vaccinators through to policy makers) to overcome these barriers and to support safe and effective vaccine delivery to big-bodied people.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rose et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb092b553a5433e34b3bachttps://doi.org/10.1071/hc25222
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1‘We just need to make sure this vaccine gets to the right place’: a qualitative study exploring vaccinators’ approaches to needle-length selection for big-bodied patients2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Needle length selection for intramuscular vaccine administration: Time for an evidence-based approach2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Choosing Wisely: Needle length and gauge considerations for intramuscular and subcutaneous injections2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4The rise (and fall?) of parental vaccine hesitancy2013 · 261 citations
  5. 5The importance of injecting vaccines into muscle2000 · 197 citations