PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Restoration Ecology0 citationsOpen Access

Ecosystem recovery in restored saltmarshes detected through invertebrate communities

View Full Paper
AQAgustina Quadri-AdroguéSTStacey M. Trevathan‐TackettKBKristian Bell

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate how well restored saltmarshes recover by examining their invertebrate communities.
  • Compared macroinvertebrate assemblages using eDNA metabarcoding and traditional sampling techniques.
  • Assessed communities across disturbed, restored, and reference saltmarsh sites.
  • Analyzed community changes relative to restoration age and condition.
  • eDNA detected fewer families but offered greater taxonomic detail and captured important compositional differences.
  • Reference sites had diverse taxa typical of healthy sediments, while restored sites had early recovery indicators.
  • Community changes increased with restoration age, suggesting convergence toward reference community characteristics.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Saltmarsh ecosystems support rich biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. Invertebrate communities underpin essential processes such as nutrient cycling and decomposition. However, saltmarshes have been widely degraded by land use change. Restoration strategies including livestock exclusion and tidal reinstatement are increasingly applied, yet their ecological outcomes for invertebrate communities remain poorly assessed. Objective To evaluate ecosystem recovery in restored saltmarshes by assessing macroinvertebrate community across disturbed, restored, and reference sites using traditional sampling and environmental DNA (eDNA) which capture complementary components of biodiversity. Methods We compared macroinvertebrate assemblages detected by eDNA metabarcoding and traditional techniques (bush beating, sweep nets, and soil cores) across disturbed, restored, and reference sites. Results eDNA detected fewer families than traditional sampling (146) but provided finer taxonomic resolution and captured compositional differences between disturbed and restored sites that traditional surveys did not detect. Species accumulation curves revealed differences in detection efficiency among sampling methods. Reference sites were dominated by taxa typical of oxygenated sediments, while restored sites supported taxa tolerant to fluctuating environmental conditions, indicative of early recovery. Livestock exclusion sites showed little differentiation from disturbed areas. Community change increased with restoration age; presence–absence data indicated convergence toward reference communities, and relative‐abundance data suggested ongoing reorganization of dominance, highlighting method‐dependent interpretations of recovery. Conclusion eDNA and traditional sampling capture complementary components of saltmarsh macroinvertebrate diversity and together provide a comprehensive understanding of restoration trajectories.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Quadri-Adrogué et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb09c9553a5433e34b41bfhttps://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70401
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper