PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Magnetic Resonance in Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

A Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Approach for Simultaneous T1‐ and PRFS ‐Based 3D MR ‐Thermometry

View Full Paper
MGMoritz GuttDHDominik HorstmannOBOthmar Belker

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess a new 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting technique for simultaneous temperature measurement during microwave ablation.
  • Used a three dimensional dual echo MRF sequence during microwave ablation of bovine liver.
  • Employs fiber optic probes as temperature references and calibrates using a parenchymal region.
  • Calculated thermal dose with CEM43 and compared with inversion-recovery imaging.
  • PRFS demonstrated high precision for temperature readings in stable phases and improved robustness near gas bubbles.
  • Achieved Dice overlap of 67.13% for PRFS and 73.80% for thermal dose maps.
  • Root Mean Square Error showed comparative effectiveness in temperature measurement at various probe locations.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate a three dimensional dual echo magnetic resonance fingerprinting sequence for simultaneous proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) and thermometry during microwave ablation with improving robustness near gas bubble induced susceptibility changes while PRFS provides high precision elsewhere. Methods An ex vivo bovine liver was heated at 40 W for 8 min. A 3D stack‐of‐spiral FLASH‐MRF acquisition on a 3 T system produced simultaneous PRFS‐ and ‐based thermometry. Two fiber optic probes served as references. was calibrated to temperature using a parenchymal region in PRFS thermometry. Thermal dose was computed as CEM43 and compared with post‐cooling inversion‐recovery imaging. Results The –temperature slope was . In non‐heated parenchyma, temporal standard deviation was for PRFS and for . At probe 1, RMSE was for PRFS and for . At a susceptibility‐prone probe, PRFS RMSE was while RMSE was regarding only time points up to a CEM43 threshold of 240 min. Dose maps achieved Dice overlap of 67.13% for PRFS and 73.80% for . Conclusion A single three dimensional MRF acquisition provided complementary temperature information. PRFS delivered high precision where phase was stable. remained monotonic near susceptibility and improved dose overlap. The framework encoded and enabled in‐session calibration from PRFS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gutt et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb09c9553a5433e34b41dchttps://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70392
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper