PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Manufacturing & Service Operations Management0 citations

Strategic Financing and Information Revelation Amid Market Competition

View Full Paper
GLGuoming LaiWXWenqiang XiaoXZXinyi Zhao

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand how firms make financing and information disclosure decisions under competitive market conditions with asymmetric information.
  • Developed a game-theoretical model for firms competing in quantity with asymmetric information about market prospects.
  • Analyzed borrowing behaviors based on varying levels of competition and capital needs.
  • Explored the implications of public versus private financing in competitive settings.
  • Firms over-finance under strong market prospects when competition is low, leading to lower interest rates.
  • In conditions of high competition and low capital needs, firms under-finance to mitigate competitive pressure.
  • Public financing generally outperforms private financing in intense competition but can still be beneficial when competition is low and capital needs are high.

Abstract

Problem definition: Interest rates on loans are often influenced by market prospects. Under asymmetric information, firms may attempt to signal strong prospects to lenders by over-borrowing. However, publicly revealing confidence in the market can also intensify competition. Motivated by these observations, we examine a firm’s financing and information disclosure strategy. Methodology/results: We develop a game-theoretical model where a firm with private information about the market prospect competes in quantity against a representative competitor. The firm has a limited amount of internal capital and must borrow from lenders to finance production. We show that when borrowing information is publicly accessible, the firm’s strategy depends on its capital needs and the level of competition. If capital needs are high and competition is low, the firm over-finances under strong market prospects to secure a lower interest rate. Conversely, if capital needs are low and competition is high, the firm under-finances under weak market prospects to reduce competitive pressure. Interestingly, in other scenarios, these opposing incentives neutralize each other, leading to a first-best outcome. We further explore private financing, where borrowing information remains undisclosed, forcing the competitor to rely on prior market information. We find that public financing generally dominates private financing under intense competition, but it can also be advantageous when competition is low and capital needs are high. Managerial implications: Our findings suggest that, under information asymmetry and competition, external borrowing can sometimes be beneficial by creating a counterbalancing force, and a slight increase in competition is not always detrimental when financing needs exist. History: This paper was selected as part of the 1RR initiative between the M&SOM Journal and the MSOM Society. This paper was part of the 2024 MSOM Service Operations SIG Conference. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2025.0243 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0a2e553a5433e34b4546https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2025.0243
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper