PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Journal of Linguistics0 citationsOpen Access

The mighty moon: colexification and change in north-west Amazonia

AAAlexandra Y. AikhenvaldRDR. M. W. Dixon

Key Points

  • Examine the processes of colexification and de-colexification in Tariana dialects due to language contact.
  • Analyzed colexification and de-colexification in two Tariana dialects.
  • Investigated the influence of East Tukanoan languages on Tariana vocabulary.
  • Compared linguistic changes in dialects resulting from cultural interactions.
  • The colexified term for 'moon' in one Tariana dialect simplifies communication.
  • Speakers of another dialect show de-colexification of terms for 'sun' and 'moon'.
  • Language contact led to significant changes in how celestial entities are expressed in Tariana.

Abstract

Abstract We focus on the dynamics of colexification, a process whereby different meanings are expressed by the same word, and its opposite, de-colexification, in language and culture contact. In multilingual environments, colexification of reference to two celestial entities – ‘sun’ and ‘moon’ – enhances intertranslatability and ease of communication between coexisting languages. The terms for ‘sun’ and ‘moon’ in two extant dialects of Tariana, the only North Arawak language in the multilingual Vaupés River Basin Linguistic Area, are a case in point. Under the influence of neighbouring majority East Tukanoan languages, the terms for ‘sun’ and ‘moon’ underwent colexification in one Tariana dialect. The recent nature of contact-induced colexification is evidenced in the ways the colexified term – which goes back to the Proto-Arawak ‘moon’ – preserves the original meaning ‘moon’ in various expressions. ‘Moon’ and not ‘sun’ is the target of colexification due to its magic powers and the frequency of its mentions, as a driving force in language change. Speakers of the other extant dialect of Tariana demonstrate the opposite process of de-colexification of ‘sun’ and ‘moon’, resulting from intensive contact with the closely related Baniwa of Içana. Communicative necessity to express matching concepts drives colexification and its demise.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aikhenvald et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0ac4553a5433e34b4b40https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226726101224
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cognitive mechanisms driving (contact-induced) language change: introduction to the special issue2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Mysteries of the Jaguar Shamans of the Northwest Amazon2013 · 64 citations
  3. 3The Huelel (Esselen) Language1995 · 9 citations
  4. 4Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change2007 · 386 citations
  5. 54. PROTO TUCANOAN1972 · 16 citations