PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026JAMA Psychiatry0 citations

Antipsychotic Efficacy and Safety of LB-102 in the Treatment of Adults With Acute Schizophrenia

View Full Paper
AEAnna EramoCCChristoph U. CorrellDWDavid P. Walling

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LB-102 in treating adults with acute schizophrenia.
  • Conducted as a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
  • Participants (aged 18-55) were randomized to receive LB-102 at varying doses or placebo over a 28-day treatment period.
  • Primary outcome measured was the change in PANSS total score from baseline to week 4.
  • LB-102 doses of 50 mg and 75 mg showed significant improvement in PANSS total score compared to placebo.
  • The 100 mg dose of LB-102 also demonstrated efficacy with a significant mean change in PANSS score.
  • Treatment-emergent adverse effects were reported in varying percentages across groups.

Abstract

Importance LB-102 ( N -methyl amisulpride) is a novel benzamide under investigation for the treatment of schizophrenia. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LB-102 in acute schizophrenia. Design, Setting, and Participants This US-based, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 randomized clinical trial (NOVA 1 ) conducted from December 2023 to August 2024 comprised an inpatient screening period (≤14 days), 28-day inpatient treatment period, 5-day inpatient stabilization period, and outpatient safety follow-up visit approximately 2 weeks after the treatment period end. Eligible participants were adults (aged 18-55 years) with schizophrenia who required hospitalization or continued hospitalization for an acute exacerbation of psychotic symptoms and had a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 80 to 120, PANSS Positive Symptoms subscale item score of 4 or greater on 2 or more key items, and a Clinical Global Impressions–Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) score of 4 or greater at screening and baseline. Interventions Participants were randomized (3:3:3:1) to oral once-daily placebo, LB-102 50 mg, 75 mg, or 100 mg. Main outcomes and Measures The primary end point was change from baseline to week 4 in PANSS total score (Hochberg multiplicity correction for LB-102 50 mg and 75 mg vs placebo). Secondary efficacy end points included changes from baseline to week 4 in CGI-S score, CGI-S response, PANSS subscale scores, PANSS Marder factor scores, and 20% or greater PANSS response. Safety and tolerability end points included treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs). Results A total of 359 participants (mean SD age, 39.1 9.3 years; 290 male 80.8%; mean baseline PANSS total score = approximately 94 across groups) were randomized and included in the safety and intention-to-treat populations (placebo, n = 108; 50 mg, n = 107; 75 mg, n = 108; 100 mg, n = 36). The trial met the primary end point: LB-102 50 mg and 75 mg, were statistically superior to placebo in change from baseline to week 4 in PANSS total score (mean SE, placebo, −9.3 1.08; 50 mg, −14.3 1.10, P lt; .001; Hedges g = 0.61; 75 mg, −14.0 1.11, P = .002; Hedges g = 0.41); LB-102 100 mg, also showed significance (mean SE, −16.1 1.91; nominal P = .002; Hedges g = 0.83). TEAEs were reported in 60 participants (56%) in the placebo group, 74 (69%) in the group receiving 50 mg, 62 (57%) in the group receiving 75 mg, and 27 (75%) in the group receiving 100 mg. Ten participants reported TEAEs leading to withdrawal (placebo, n = 2; 50 mg, n = 2; 75 mg, n = 3; 100 mg, n = 3) with 5 serious TEAEs (placebo, n = 2 including 1 death; each LB-102 arm, n = 1). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial provided rigorous evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of LB-102 for the treatment of adults with acute schizophrenia. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06179108

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eramo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0b25553a5433e34b4febhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.0428
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Lurasidone in Adolescents and Young Adults with Schizophrenia: Pooled Post hoc Analyses of Two 12-month Extension Studies2024
  2. 2Long-term safety and effectiveness of lurasidone in adolescents and young adults with schizophrenia: pooled post hoc analyses of two 12-month extension studies2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3A Phase 2b Multicenter Study to Evaluate Basmisanil as an Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia2026
  4. 4Lurasidone in Schizophrenia Management: A Comprehensive 12-Week Post-Marketing Surveillance Study in Chinese Patients2026
  5. 5610. LONG-TERM ADJUNCTIVE LUMATEPERONE TREATMENT IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER: RESULTS FROM A SIX-MONTH OPEN-LABEL EXTENSION STUDY2025