This monograph integrates a decade of research into the TNA Framework, a unified theory of Axiomatic Structuralism. The central thesis posits that no coherent system—be it logical, physical, or conscious—can fully justify its own conditions of coherence; instead, every system requires an external structural anchor, defined as the latent domain N₁, which cannot be derived from within the observable domain N₀. We formalize the Theorem of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA), demonstrating that a minimal core of non-derivable axioms is essential for systemic stability. This framework is applied to resolve fundamental paradoxes: in quantum mechanics, wave-function collapse is reinterpreted as a boundary-induced phase transition; in dynamics, randomness is revealed as the macroscopic manifestation of unresolved structural multiplicity in non-Lipschitz regimes. Furthermore, we define consciousness as a persistent, self-reinforcing bridge between the semantic (N₁) and logical (N₀) levels. By shifting from post-materialist narratives to a formal focus on structural limits, TNA provides a robust methodology for understanding the necessity of external constraints in the evolution of complex systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Claudio Bresciano
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Claudio Bresciano (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0b50553a5433e34b5248 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19701389