PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Juggling Global, National, and Institutional Demands: Multi-Stakeholder Dynamics in Global Citizenship Education for Pre-Service Teachers

View Full Paper
JKJiyoung KangJHJihee Han

Key Points

  • This research investigates the negotiation of global, national, and institutional pressures in developing a Global Citizenship Education course for pre-service teachers.
  • Investigated power dynamics among stakeholders involved in curriculum design in South Korea.
  • Examined pedagogical strategies, including thematic coverage and project-based learning.
  • Analyzed assessment systems and flexibility in evaluation methods.
  • Identified strategies for managing competing stakeholder claims in curriculum design.
  • Demonstrated the importance of field practitioner engagement in course development.
  • Contributed non-Western perspectives to the largely Western-dominated field of Global Citizenship Education.

Abstract

Global Citizenship Education (GCE) in teacher education is shaped by higher education institutions and the priorities of many organizations and governments. This study examines how global, national, and institutional demands were negotiated in designing a pre-service teacher GCE course in South Korea. The study identifies how actors exercised power, legitimacy, and urgency in shaping curricular choices, pedagogical approaches, and assessment systems, which resulted in strategies such as broad thematic coverage, engagement with field practitioners, project-based learning, and flexible evaluation. It highlights the relational and political nature of curriculum-making, highlighting the key role of balancing competing stakeholder claims. The study contributes non-Western perspectives to a field dominated by Western contexts, offering insights into how GCE can be adapted under centralized governance and institutional constraints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0cb2553a5433e34b5b03https://doi.org/10.22804/kjep.2025.22.2.003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Issues and challenges of educators in implementing global citizenship education in South Korea2017 · 1 citations
  2. 2Understanding global citizenship education in the classroom: A case study of teaching practices2024 · 8 citations
  3. 3Teacher professionalisation at the intersection of open, moral and critical Global Citizenship Education: Reflections from an international comparative study2026
  4. 4Global citizenship education as a destabilising force for education systems: a scoping review of glocalised, justice-oriented pedagogies2026
  5. 5Global Citizenship Education in English pedagogy: reflecting on decisions and discomfort2026