PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026Head & Neck0 citationsOpen Access

Predominance of In‐Field Recurrence After Radiotherapy for Sinonasal Cancer: A Single‐Center Retrospective Study

View Full Paper
MRM. de RidderLVL. J. van de VeldeTBT. de Bie

Key Points

  • The study aims to analyze local recurrence patterns after radiotherapy in sinonasal malignancies to improve treatment strategies.
  • Retrospective cohort study of 104 sinonasal malignancy patients treated with curative-intent radiotherapy from 2010 to 2022.
  • Local recurrences classified as in-field, marginal, or out-of-field based on imaging and dose distribution.
  • Recurrence locations compared to pretreatment plans to assess treatment effectiveness.
  • 25% local recurrence rate observed among patients.
  • 81% of local recurrences occurred in-field within the high-dose region (> 95% of prescribed dose) with a median dose of 65 Gy.
  • Local recurrence significantly impaired disease-specific survival.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Sinonasal malignancies (SNM) are rare, heterogeneous tumors with poor prognosis. There is an unmet need to improve treatment outcomes. Despite advances in imaging and molecular classification, optimal curative radiotherapy (RT) strategies remain undefined. We analyzed the pattern of failure after RT, focusing in depth on local recurrence. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 104 SNM patients treated with curative‐intent RT (either primary or after endoscopic surgery) at a tertiary center between 2010 and 2022. Local recurrences were delineated on follow‐up imaging and registered to pretreatment plans. Recurrence location was classified as in‐field, marginal, or out‐of‐field based on dose at the center of mass. Results Local recurrence rate was 25%. Most local recurrences (81%) occurred in‐field in the high‐dose region (> 95% of prescribed dose), with a median dose of 65 Gy. Perineural spread accounted for most out‐of‐field failures. Local recurrence significantly impaired disease‐specific survival. Conclusions Local failures after RT for SNM predominantly arise in‐field within adequately irradiated volumes, suggesting biological radioresistance. These findings support the need for histology‐driven, biologically tailored treatment strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ridder et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b0688ba6daa22dac912https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70287
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Molecularly defined sinonasal malignancies: an overview with focus on the current WHO classification and recently described provisional entities2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Patterns of Treatment Failure in Patients with Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma2018 · 59 citations
  3. 3Radiotherapy of sinonasal cancers: 2025 update2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Incidence and survival in patients with sinonasal cancer: A historical analysis of population‐based data2011 · 607 citations
  5. 5Update from the 4th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumours: Tumors of the Nasal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses and Skull Base2017 · 116 citations