PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026European Journal of Human Genetics1 citationsOpen Access

Opportunistic genomic screening of healthy controls in an Australian biobank

LML A MitchellMYMary-Anne YoungTOThomas Ohnesorg

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of opportunistic genomic screening for secondary findings in healthy individuals within a biobank.
  • Leveraged whole genome sequencing data from 1057 healthy participants in the Tasmanian Ophthalmic Biobank.
  • Screened for pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes listed in the ACMG SF v3.0.
  • Manually curated variants and returned only actionable secondary findings.
  • Identified actionable secondary findings in 3.6% (38/1057) of participants.
  • Most common genes involved were HFE, LDLR, and TP53.
  • Of the 38 participants, 27 received results, with two-thirds being newly informed.

Abstract

Abstract Leveraging existing genomic data to opportunistically screen for secondary findings (SFs) can identify individuals at increased genetic risk who may be missed by criteria-based testing. While some guidelines support returning actionable SFs with professional support, there is a gap in consistent practice regarding the return process. This study reports the outcomes of opportunistic genomic screening in an Australian biobank. Whole genome sequencing data from 1057 healthy participants in the Tasmanian Ophthalmic Biobank (TOB), all of white European ancestry, underwent opportunistic screening for pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants affecting genes in the ACMG SF v3.0 list. Variants of interest were manually curated, and only P/LP variants were returned. Actionable SFs (P/LP variants) were identified in 3.6% (38/1057) of participants. The most common genes were HFE (haemochromatosis), LDLR (Familial Hypercholesterolemia), and TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome). Of the 38 participants with a variant, 27 received their result, with two-thirds being newly informed. Ten participants were referred to clinical genetics for diagnostic confirmation, while seven declined to proceed. Opportunistic screening identified a clinically significant incidence of actionable SFs in a healthy biobank cohort. There was high participant interest in receiving results, although subsequent uptake of clinical referral remains a challenge.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mitchell et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b0688ba6daa22dac943https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02104-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper