PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery0 citations

Long-Term Outcome of Secondary Gingivoperiosteoplasty Versus Alveolar Bone Grafting in Complete Cleft Lip and Palate

View Full Paper
KHKhamis M. AI HasaniCYChuan-Fong YaoYCYun-Fang Chen

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes of secondary gingivoperiosteoplasty compared to alveolar bone grafting in patients with cleft lip and palate.
  • Compared outcomes of secondary gingivoperiosteoplasty and secondary alveolar bone grafting in selected patients.
  • Focused on cases of unilateral cleft lip and palate.
  • Emphasized careful interpretation of findings due to case selection differences.
  • Secondary gingivoperiosteoplasty shows reliable long-term outcomes in selected unilateral cleft patients.
  • Both techniques proved effective when indicated, though caution is advised in direct comparisons.

Abstract

Secondary gingivoperiosteoplasty provides reliable long-term outcomes in selected patients with alveolar clefts, especially in unilateral cases. Both GPP and secondary alveolar bone grafting are effective when appropriately indicated, though direct comparisons between the techniques should be interpreted cautiously, given differences in case selection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hasani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b0688ba6daa22dac9b9https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000013140
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper