Abstract This article brings together two stories of 1970s Mexico that are often narrated separately: the story of the PRI’s attempts to reform itself, specifically through the right to know, and the story of activists’ mobilizations against disappearances. Epistemic struggles surrounding the right to know and disappearances created a shared discursive arena in which activists and state officials contested the nature of information, the authority to produce it, and the seemingly unbridgeable gap between evidence and the state’s recognition of wrongdoing. Debates in the legislative and activist realms often occurred in parallel without necessarily intersecting. Nonetheless, they engaged similar questions: What would it mean to entrust the public and media with sensitive information? What strategies could move state actors to produce information and what effects would doing so have on public life? This article contends that the struggle over information and recognition became the central battlefield for negotiating state violence and opening in Mexico.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vanessa Freije
Comparative Studies in Society and History
University of Washington
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vanessa Freije (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b6088ba6daa22dacef7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417526100425