Background: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) in bronchiectasis is frequently accompanied by excessive airway secretions. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) delivers heated, humidified gas and may improve respiratory mechanics, but quantitatively measured secretion burden during HFNC in bronchiectasis-related ARF is poorly described. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center pilot cohort study in a respiratory intermediate care unit including adults with computed tomography–confirmed bronchiectasis admitted with ARF and treated with HFNC as first-line therapy. The primary outcome was cumulative secretion volume (operationally defined as supervised collection of expectorated sputum, with measures to minimize saliva contamination) during the first 3 days of HFNC exposure. Physiologic variables, gas exchange, dyspnea, and clinical outcomes were assessed descriptively. Results: Twenty-six subjects were enrolled (median age 67 years, 54% female), predominantly with moderate-to-severe bronchiectasis. Median cumulative secretion volume over 72 h was 510 mL (436–743), and daily secretion volume increased from Day 1 to Day 3 ( P < .001). Breathing frequency, oxygenation, dyspnea (Borg scale), and selected gas-exchange variables changed significantly over time. No subject required escalation to noninvasive ventilation or endotracheal intubation. In-hospital mortality was 11.5% (3/26), occurring exclusively in subjects with preestablished do-not-intubate directives. Conclusions: In this pilot cohort of bronchiectasis-related ARF, structured quantification of secretion volume during HFNC was feasible and documented a large early secretion burden over 72 h. Given the uncontrolled design, these findings are descriptive and should not be interpreted as evidence of treatment effect.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nicolás Colaianni-Alfonso
Guillermo Montiel
Catalina Siroti
Respiratory Care
University of Catania
Policlinico Universitario di Catania
Hospital Fernández
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Colaianni-Alfonso et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b8a88ba6daa22dad0be — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654261437778