PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Frontiers in Immunology0 citationsOpen Access

A single-center clinical study on the combination of Five-flavor sophora flavescens enteric-coated capsules and vedolizumab in induction therapy for ulcerative colitis

XLXinglang LiLZL ZhouFTFeng Tian

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of combining Vedolizumab with Five-flavor sophora flavescens for ulcerative colitis induction therapy.
  • Patients with ulcerative colitis received either Vedolizumab alone or in combination with Five-flavor sophora flavescens.
  • Primary outcomes included clinical and endoscopic response rates at weeks 14 and 52.
  • Secondary endpoints evaluated corticosteroid withdrawal, bowel movements, and inflammatory markers.
  • Clinical response rates were significantly higher in the combination group (97.4% vs. 79.1%, P = 0.011, 95% CI 4.1%, 32.8%) at week 14.
  • Endoscopic response at week 14 was improved with combination therapy (74.4% vs. 51.2%, P = 0.031, 95% CI 2.2%, 41.4%).
  • No serious adverse reactions were reported in either treatment group.

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Vedolizumab (VDZ) combined with Five-flavor sophora flavescens enteric-coated capsules (FSEC) for induction therapy in Ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods UC patients treated with FSEC and/or VDZ were enrolled and divided into combination group (VDZ+FSEC) and single drug group (VDZ). The primary end points were clinical and endoscopic response and remission rates at week 14 and week 52. Secondary end points were the 14-week corticosteroid withdrawal rate, the number of bowel movements, the number of bloody stools, improvement in inflammatory markers, and safety. Results The clinical response rate (97.4% vs. 79.1%, P = 0.011, 95% confidence interval(CI) 4.1%, 32.8%) and endoscopic response rate (74.4% vs. 51.2%, P = 0.031, 95%CI 2.2%, 41.4%) at week 14 in the combination group were significantly higher than those in the single-agent group. PP analysis showed that the endoscopic response rate at week 52 in the combination group was significantly better than that in the monotherapy group (85.7% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.042, 95%CI 2.0%, 44.4%), but there was no significant difference in ITT analysis. At week 14, the number of bowel movements and hematochezia scores were significantly improved in the combination group and the monotherapy group, and the improvement in the combination group was more significant at early stage and multiple time points. There were no serious adverse reactions in the two groups. Conclusion FSEC combined with VDZ demonstrated superior clinical response rates and endoscopic response rates, and had greater advantages in early improvement of hematochezia and defecation frequency, compared to VDZ monotherapy, with a favorable safety profile.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edaa9b4a46254e215b31fdhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1791086
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper