PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Frontiers in Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics in multiple myeloma: a systematic review of prognostic biomarkers and minimal residual disease monitoring

NMNaseel MoursyHSHibba SirajZNZainab Nasir

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the prognostic value of mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics in multiple myeloma.
  • Conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Included studies on quantitative MS-based proteomics or metabolomics with outcomes compared to ISS/R-ISS or traditional MRD detection.
  • Focused data analysis on overall survival, progression-free survival, hazard ratios, and MRD sensitivity.
  • Identified 19 studies meeting inclusion criteria from 1,077 records.
  • Discovery studies revealed MS-derived signatures linked to progression-free survival and overall survival.
  • MS-based MRD detection showed up to 1,000-fold higher sensitivity than traditional methods, identifying biochemical relapse earlier.

Abstract

Introduction Current multiple myeloma (MM) risk stratification, anchored on the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS), provides a static snapshot of disease but fails to capture its dynamic biological evolution, functional tumor-microenvironment crosstalk, and real-time treatment response. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic and metabolomic profiling has emerged as a high-sensitivity tool for both novel biomarker discovery and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. This systematic review evaluates the independent prognostic value and clinical utility of quantitative MS-based proteomics and metabolomics compared to standard-of-care risk models and traditional disease monitoring techniques. Methods Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted. Inclusion required quantitative MS-based proteomics or metabolomics in MM cohorts with outcomes compared to ISS/R-ISS or traditional MRD detection methods. Data analysis was performed with a focus on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), hazard ratios (HR), and MRD sensitivity thresholds. Results From 1,077 records, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven discovery-focused studies identified specific MS-derived signatures, such as microenvironmental proteins (e.g., MTA2, CD44) and dysregulated lipid metabolites (e.g., acylcarnitines, LysoPE) that were consistently associated with PFS and OS. Crucially, MS-based biomarkers retained independent prognostic significance in multivariate models adjusted for R-ISS. Furthermore, 8 studies tackling blood-based MS-MRD detection demonstrated up to 1,000-fold higher sensitivity than traditional immunofixation electrophoresis, identified biochemical relapse 2–11 months earlier, and achieved high concordance with bone marrow-based assays (NGS/NGF). Conclusion In conclusion, quantitative MS profiling provides a high-resolution molecular lens that significantly refines MM risk stratification beyond static staging. By enabling non-invasive, longitudinal MRD monitoring with superior lead times, MS integration facilitates a shift from reactive to proactive intervention. Standardization of bioinformatics pipelines and MS methodologies is now the final barrier to implementing MS-guided treatment adjustments in routine clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moursy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edaa9b4a46254e215b320ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1791030
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper