PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Neurology Clinical Practice0 citations

Evaluating the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination Against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

View Full Paper
CPChristine ParkTFThomas J. FarrerJSJill Z. Stuart

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination (DICE) and its concurrent validity with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
  • Evaluated DICE against MoCA for cognitive assessment.
  • Assessed sensitivity and clinical utility across different cognitive impairment groups.
  • DICE demonstrated strong concurrent validity with MoCA for detecting cognitive impairment.
  • Significant differences in performance were observed across clinical groups.

Abstract

Rapid and valid cognitive screening tools are a mainstay of clinical practice in the assessment of mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Although there are several available tools, there is concern for reduced sensitivity over time. This study evaluates the Duke Iterative Cognitive Examination (DICE) to establish concurrent validity with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and to establish the clinical utility of the DICE in differentiating clinical groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Park et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edaafc4a46254e215b346ahttps://doi.org/10.1212/cpj.0000000000200617
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper