PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Education Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Digital Literacy and Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Gaps and Training Opportunities in the Post-Truth Era

View Full Paper
MRMónica Rodríguez-DíazRFRaúl Rodríguez Ferrándiz

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the self-perception of digital literacy and critical thinking among master's students in the context of disinformation.
  • Non-experimental descriptive design
  • Survey conducted with a self-administered online questionnaire including 53 items
  • Sample includes 72 master's students from three Spanish universities (October 2024–March 2025)
  • 97% of students use Instagram, and 96% use WhatsApp for information
  • 65% are aware of disinformation on social media but take limited countermeasures
  • Only 25% can identify a professional fact-checking organization

Abstract

Disinformation is a global challenge that affects areas such as politics, health, economics, and science and is spread rapidly by social media (SM), suggesting the necessity of advancing educational proposals to strengthen critical thinking (CT) and digital literacy (DL). This quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive study identified the self-perception that master’s students (n = 72; at three Spanish universities; October 2024–March 2025) have regarding their DL, along with their CT, in post-truth and fake news settings. A self-administered online questionnaire (53 items) was conducted, covering aspects such as the responsible use of information and platforms, algorithmic perceptions, actions taken to verify this information, and concepts of CT, post-truth, and fake news. The results show that Instagram (97%) and WhatsApp (96%) predominated, with a notable proportion of users (86%) reporting that algorithms influenced them ‘highly’ or ‘moderately’. Despite being aware of disinformation they find on social media (65%) as well as its close link to hate speech (90% who ‘strongly’ or ‘somewhat’ agreed), this knowledge does not fully translate into taking measures to counter it. In fact 61% of respondents report sharing news on at least some occasions, while only 25% are able to identify a professional fact-checking organization. In conclusion, these findings suggest the merit of assessing the prevalence of skills such as Critical Thinking (CT) and strategies like fact-checking among students in other postgraduate education systems. Such assessments could inform the potential promotion of media and digital literacy as cross-curricular skills in education. This approach would help bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and the active verification needed to counter disinformation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rodríguez-Díaz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edabb84a46254e215b392fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050684
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper