PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Experimental and Simulation Performance of Dynamic Behavior and Impact System for Hydraulic Rock Drill

View Full Paper
SXShunhai XuZYZhao YuxiangCWChunhui Wang

Key Points

  • This research aims to clarify the dynamic behavior and improve the impact performance of hydraulic rock drills.
  • Developed a dynamic test platform using a laser displacement sensor to measure impact dynamics.
  • Conducted tests to analyze how input pressure affects impact frequency and energy.
  • Created and validated an AMESim simulation model to explore the impact system's mechanisms.
  • Impact frequency increased from 50 Hz to 76.9 Hz as input pressure rose from 10 MPa to 23 MPa.
  • Optimal stroke reversal interval of 12 mm maximized impact power to 17,561.3 W, improving by 4.70% and 3.12% over 7 mm and 17 mm intervals, respectively.

Abstract

Hydraulic rock drill exhibits outstanding attributes of high power and high frequency, but there are some issues including unclear mechanisms governing impact dynamic behaviors and inaccurate evaluation of impact performance. In this study, a dynamic test platform for the hydraulic rock drill was established by employing the terminal velocity method, utilizing a high-frequency non-contact laser displacement sensor to precisely capture the transient kinematics of the impact piston. The quantitative results indicate that as the input pressure rises from 10 MPa to 23 MPa, the impact frequency increases from 50 Hz to 76.9 Hz, and the impact energy increases from 89.9 J to 275 J. A hydraulic rock drill AMESim simulation model incorporating the impact system, collision medium and buffer system was developed and validated. This reveals the operating mechanism of impact piston driven by the equivalent pressure difference between the front and rear chambers. And the stroke reversal interval governs the duration between the deceleration onset and collision of the impact piston. As a result, both excessively large and small stroke reversal intervals will lower the impact power. The 12 mm stroke reversal interval has been identified as the optimal setting for maximizing impact power, at which the impact power reaches 17,561.3 W, which presents an increase of 4.70% and 3.12% compared to the intervals of 7 mm and 17 mm, respectively. This study contributes a reliable theoretical basis and direct data support to the performance evaluation and optimized design of hydraulic shock systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edabb84a46254e215b3a0bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16094153
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact performance optimization for hydraulic rock drill based on stroke and flow compensation factors2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Highly Accurate Rock Simulation System Based on Gas-Liquid Coupling Mechanism with Non- Harmonic Impact of Variable Stiffness and Damping Characteristics2024
  3. 3Research and Optimization of Impact Performance for Hydraulic Impact Hammers2026
  4. 4Evaluation of the Efficiency of Impact Mechanisms on the Example of Hydraulic Rotary Hammer Drills2025
  5. 5A novel model for dual-control hydraulic rock drill based on valve-cylinder coupling2026