PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Journal of Hazardous Materials Plastics0 citationsOpen Access

Root entry pathways dictate type-dependent uptake, translocation and phytotoxicity of microplastics in tobacco

View Full Paper
PWPeng WangYMYixuan MiYXYunxiang Xu

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare how different types of microplastics affect uptake, translocation, and physiological responses in tobacco plants.
  • Hydroponic growth of tobacco plants with exposure to polystyrene microspheres and polyacrylonitrile microfibers.
  • Assessment of root entry pathways, uptake, translocation, and physiological impacts of both microplastic types.
  • Transcriptomic analyses to evaluate gene expression related to stress responses.
  • PS microspheres achieved significantly higher root uptake and translocation efficiency compared to PAN microfibers (specific metrics not provided).
  • PS exposure inhibited growth and disrupted nitrogen and carbon metabolism at concentrations ≥ 1 mg/L, while PAN only became harmful at ≥ 50 mg/L.
  • Transcriptomic analysis indicated a stronger activation of stress-responsive genes under PS treatment.

Abstract

Microplastic pollution increasingly threatens agricultural ecosystems, yet how different microplastic types interact with plants remains largely unknown. Here, we systematically compared the uptake, translocation, and physiological impacts of polystyrene (PS) microspheres and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) microfibers in hydroponically grown tobacco. We identified distinct root entry pathways: PS microspheres penetrated via the root apex and lateral root initiation sites, whereas PAN microfibers infiltrated exclusively through intercellular gaps at lateral root emergence, failing to cross the root apex. Both types subsequently translocated to aerial tissues, with PS microspheres demonstrating significantly higher root uptake, retention, and shoot translocation efficiency than PAN microfibers. Growth responses were strongly type- and concentration-dependent: PS microspheres inhibited growth, photosynthesis, and root development at ≥ 1 mg/L, while PAN microfibers promoted growth over a broader range (0.1–10 mg/L), becoming inhibitory only at ≥ 50 mg/L. PS exposure induced more pronounced disruptions in nitrogen assimilation, carbon metabolism, and key hormone signaling (ethylene, auxin, cytokinin, gibberellin), alongside greater reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and intensified antioxidant responses. Transcriptomic analyses corroborated these physiological findings, revealing stronger activation of stress-responsive genes under PS treatment. This study reveals that structurally distinct microplastics differ not only in uptake and translocation efficiency, but also in root entry pathways and downstream physiological and transcriptomic responses, identifying microplastic morphology as a key determinant of plant phytotoxicity. These findings provide important insights for ecological risk assessment and mitigation of agricultural microplastic pollution. • PS microspheres and PAN microfibers differ in uptake and translocation in tobacco. • Polystyrene microspheres penetrate both the root apex and lateral-root initiation sites, whereas polyacrylonitrile microfibers infiltrate only intercellular spaces at lateral-root initiation and do not cross the apex. • PS microspheres shows higher toxicity at lower concentrations than PAN microfibers. • PS microspheres disrupts nitrogen, carbon metabolism, and hormone signaling. • PS microspheres triggers stronger stress-related gene expression than PAN microfibers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edabb84a46254e215b3a4chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazmp.2026.100056
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ultrafine polystyrene nanoplastics penetrate roots and induce organelle damage and extensive transcriptomic reprogramming in Arabidopsis thaliana2026
  2. 2Microplastics in Mediterranean Agricultural Soils: Effects on Soil Properties, Metal Accumulation in Plants, and Implications for Sustainable Agroecosystems2026
  3. 3Visual Tracking and Quantitative Analysis of Polystyrene Nanoplastics Uptake and Transport across Various Tomato Varieties2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4Microplastic uptake and impacts on crops under realistic exposure: implications for soil–plant systems2026 · 9 citations
  5. 5Microplastic-Derived Dissolved Organic Matter Inhibits Plant Root Growth by Disrupting Polar Auxin Transport via Specific Molecular Fractions2026 · 1 citations