PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Trees Forests and People0 citationsOpen Access

Biomass and carbon quantification in Teak (Tectona grandis) forests: a global systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
MQMuhammad Abdul QiromRPRis Hadi PurwantoHKHaruni Krisnawati

Key Points

  • This research aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of biomass and carbon accounting parameters specific to teak forests.
  • Conducted a systematic review of 111 publications and meta-analysis of 59 studies.
  • Analyzed geographical distribution and variability of data regarding biomass and carbon.
  • Evaluated methodological inconsistencies in current assessments.
  • Stems account for 66.9% of total biomass, indicating significant carbon allocation in woody components.
  • Mean biomass expansion factor was found to be 1.66, and the mean root-to-shoot ratio was 0.23.
  • Mean carbon concentrations were highest in stems (48.9%) compared to understorey vegetation (44.2%) and litter (42.8%).

Abstract

Teak ( Tectona grandis ) is a highly valuable tropical hardwood species that provides substantial economic returns and important ecological functions, including carbon (C) sequestration benefits. Accurate estimation of C stocks in teak forests is critical for climate mitigation. Yet, current assessments are constrained by methodological inconsistencies and the widespread use of generalized parameters, such as biomass expansion factor (BEF), C conversion factor (CCF), and root-to-shoot ratio (RSR). Here, we systematically reviewed 111 publications and conducted a meta-analysis of 59 studies to develop a global synthesis of teak-specific biomass and C accounting parameters. The compiled dataset is geographically uneven, with most studies originating from Asia and comparatively limited data from Africa and Latin America. Our results revealed that stems account for the majority of total tree biomass (66.9%), followed by branches (16.6%), roots (12.8%), and foliage (≤ 3.7%), indicating predominant C allocation in long-lived woody components. The pooled mean BEF was 1.66, and the mean RSR was 0.23. Mean C concentrations were 48.9% in stem biomass, 44.2% in understorey vegetation, and 42.8% in litter. However, heterogeneity was consistently high across studies, indicating substantial variability associated with differences in site conditions, stand characteristics, and methodological approaches. These findings demonstrate that uniform application of BEF, RSR, and CCF can introduce systematic bias in teak C estimates. We recommend the adoption of species- and site-specific parameters, inclusion of coarse woody debris, and standardized, depth-explicit soil protocols to improve accuracy and comparability. Overall, this synthesis provides an evidence-based framework for teak C assessments and highlights the role of sustainably managed teak plantations in climate-change mitigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qirom et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edabdf4a46254e215b3a9chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2026.101276
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper