PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Apidologie0 citationsOpen Access

Developmental and behavioral modulation of humoral immunity in the stingless bee Frieseomelitta varia

FDFernanda de Angeli DalarmiMBMárcia Maria Gentile BitondiZSZilá Luz Paulino Simões

Key Points

  • This research investigates how age and behavioral roles influence humoral immunity in the stingless bee Frieseomelitta varia.
  • Performed bacterial challenge assays in Frieseomelitta varia to measure humoral immune responses
  • Quantified expression of antimicrobial peptides and regulatory genes during different developmental stages
  • Analyzed responses at 6 and 26 hours post injury from saline and E. coli injections
  • Adults exhibited higher AMP gene expression levels than larvae and pupae
  • At 26 hours, newly emerged and nurse bees showed maintained AMP responses to sepsis; foragers increased relish expression

Abstract

Abstract The innate immune system of insects combines cellular and humoral responses that act together to protect against infection. Humoral defense involves the production of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), regulated by the Toll and Imd pathways. We performed the first controlled bacterial challenge assays in the stingless bee Frieseomelitta varia to investigate how age and behavior influence humoral immunity. The expression of the AMP genes hymenoptaecin and defensin -1, and the regulatory genes cactus (Toll pathway) and relish (Imd pathway), was quantified at key developmental stages, and in adults (newly emerged, nurse, and forager workers) after 6 and 26 h after aseptic (saline injection) and septic ( Escherichia coli injection) injury. Adults showed higher basal transcript levels than larvae and pupae, suggesting that immune activation is inherent to developmental maturation. At 6 h, all adult groups similarly upregulated the four genes following both injuries. After 26 h, however, newly emerged and nurse bees maintained AMP-biased responses to sepsis, whereas foragers restrained AMP induction but upregulated relish . These age- and behavior-dependent immune profiles suggest trade-offs between susceptibility and resistance, shaped by physiological state and task-specific environmental exposure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dalarmi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac074a46254e215b3cf4https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-026-01270-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper