Host alternation is a common behavioral strategy among many herbivorous insects. The mulberry longhorn beetle, Apriona germari is a destructive wood-boring pest. The adults exhibit rhythmic host alternation between feeding and oviposition hosts. However, the temporal rhythm and regulatory mechanisms underlying this behavior remain unclear. In the present study, by observing the dynamics of the numbers of A. germari on mulberry (Morus alba, feeding host) and willow (Salix babylonica, oviposition host) trees in a cage, we first found that both females and males began to aggregate on mulberry trees at dawn. Following 18:00 at dusk, the number of females on mulberry declined sharply, whereas the number of males decreased slightly, with a greater proportion of males staying on mulberry. To investigate the role of host volatiles in regulating the host alternation in A. germari, we then carried out two-choice olfactory assays to test whether the behavioral responses of A. germari to the host volatiles from mulberry and willow twigs differed between 04:00 and 08:00 (dawn, aggregated on mulberry) and 18:00 to 22:00 (dusk, dispersed from mulberry). Males were consistently attracted to the volatiles from healthy mulberry at both dawn and dusk, but not to those from willow. Females showed no attraction to the volatiles from either of two hosts at dawn; however, at dusk, they were significantly attracted to willow volatiles. Furthermore, volatiles from feeding-damaged mulberry trees were repellent to both sexes, particularly to males at dawn. These results indicate that the rhythmic host alternation in A. germari is partly mediated by host volatiles and an unidentified male-produced pheromone may be present in this species. Our findings can deepen the understanding of the host alternation in longhorn beetles, and offer a theoretical foundation for developing semiochemical-based, eco-friendly strategies for controlling this pest.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: