PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Geophysical Research Letters1 citationsOpen Access

Impact of Mantle Velocity Uncertainty on Receiver‐Function Imaging of the Transition Zone

View Full Paper
CCCarlos A. M ChavesFCFelipe P. CorralJRJeroen Ritsema

Key Points

  • The study aims to understand how mantle velocity uncertainty impacts the imaging of mantle discontinuities in the transition zone.
  • Computed common-conversion-point images using spectral-element method synthetics for eight global and regional tomographic models.
  • Focused on the mantle beneath North America to evaluate topographic mapping of the 400-km and 670-km mantle discontinuities.
  • Revealed artificial undulations in the 400-km and 670-km mantle discontinuities due to velocity correction errors.
  • Identified variations in mantle transition zone thickness that are significant compared to actual topography observed using USArray data.

Abstract

Abstract Seismological estimates of the 400‐km and 670‐km mantle discontinuities (d400 and d670) are crucial for understanding the thermochemical structure and dynamics of the mantle transition zone (MTZ). However, artifacts from using ray theory and uncertainties in mantle velocity structure can affect topographic mapping of these boundaries. The artifacts are expected but have not been thoroughly explored. We focus on the mantle beneath North America, computing common‐conversion‐point (CCP) images using spectral‐element method synthetics for eight global and regional tomographic models. Our results reveal artificial undulations in d400 and d670 and variations in MTZ thickness arising from incorrect velocity corrections that are large compared to actual topography resolved using USArray data. Our synthetic experiments highlight that interpretation of d400 and d670 maps from CCP imaging and similar techniques should be done judiciously, due to substantial uncertainties introduced by velocity corrections.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaves et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac2e4a46254e215b3f54https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl121559
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1GLAD-M35: a joint P and S global tomographic model with uncertainty quantification2024 · 46 citations
  2. 2The TauP Toolkit: Flexible Seismic Travel-time and Ray-path Utilities1999 · 1,057 citations
  3. 3The Generic Mapping Tools Version 62019 · 3,293 citations
  4. 4The system Mg2SiO4‐Fe2SiO4 at high pressures and temperatures: Precise determination of stabilities of olivine, modified spinel, and spinel1989 · 703 citations
  5. 5Boundary and volumetric sensitivity kernels of teleseismic receiver functions for mantle discontinuities in the transition zone2023 · 2 citations