PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth0 citationsOpen Access

Temporal trends in estimated fetal weight accuracy following national guideline implementation: a six-year cohort study at a tertiary center in Southern China (2014–2019)

YWYuji WangJZJ ZhaoJTJing Tao

Key Points

  • The study aimed to evaluate the changes in the accuracy of ultrasound-based estimated fetal weight following the implementation of national guidelines in China.
  • Retrospective cohort study analyzing data from 31,681 singleton pregnancies between 2014-2019.
  • Temporal trends in estimated fetal weight accuracy and biometric parameters were assessed quarterly.
  • Statistical analyses included odds ratios and false-positive rates for detecting fetal growth abnormalities.
  • Mean percentage error of estimated fetal weight approaching zero, with the percentage within 10% of birth weight increasing from 78.0% to 93.2%.
  • Detection rates for severe large-for-gestational-age decreased from 2.06% to 0.67%, with false-positive rates lowering from 1.59% to 0.22%.
  • Sustained improvements in accuracy of biometric parameters, especially femur length, with better detection of low birth weight.

Abstract

In 2012, China released its first national guidelines for prenatal ultrasound screening, marking a major step toward standardized and assessable prenatal ultrasound practice nationwide. However, real-world evidence on the effectiveness of these guidelines in clinical practice remains limited, particularly from large-scale, long-term datasets. To address this gap, we aimed to examine temporal trends in the accuracy of ultrasound-based estimated fetal weight (EFW) following the guidelines’ implementation in China. This retrospective cohort study analyzed real-world data from 31,681 singleton pregnancies between 2014 and 2019, drawn from the integrated ultrasound and perinatal databases at a tertiary maternity hospital in southern China. Temporal trends in EFW accuracy, fetal biometric parameters (biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length), and diagnostic performance for fetal growth abnormalities were analysed by calendar quarter from January 2014 to December 2019. EFW accuracy improved progressively over time, with the mean percentage error nearing zero and the proportion of estimates within 10% and 15% of birthweight rising from 78.0% to 93.2% in 2014 to 86.2% and 97.3% in 2019 (OR = 1.032 and 1.045; P 97th percentile) decreasing from 2.06% to 0.67% (FPRs 1.59% to 0.22%), while fetal growth restriction (EFW <3rd percentile) detection slightly increased from 0.37% to 0.50% (FPRs 0.19% to 0.28%), and false-negative rates remained stable. Similar improvements were observed using absolute birthweight thresholds, with reduced overestimation of macrosomia and enhanced detection of low birthweight, indicating a better balance in EFW’s diagnostic performance across the fetal growth spectrum. This large-scale longitudinal study revealed sustained improvements in EFW accuracy, biometric measurement consistency, and fetal growth abnormality detection following China’s 2012 national guidelines. These advances likely reflect standardized protocols, training, quality assurance, and accumulating operator experience. Future multicenter studies are needed to assess their broader clinical impact.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac2e4a46254e215b3f81https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-09050-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Accuracy of Ultrasound Estimation of Fetal Weight (EFW) at Term: Insights From a Malaysian Tertiary Hospital for Primary Care Implementation2026
  2. 2Accuracy of ultrasound-derived estimated fetal weight in a cohort of periviable births2026
  3. 3The role of sonographic estimated fetal weight compared to clinical assessment: superior accuracy only in extreme fetal weight cases2026
  4. 4Sonographic fetal weight estimation percentiles should be interpreted with caution in the second trimester2025
  5. 5Sonographic fetal weight estimation percentiles should be interpreted with caution in the second trimester2025