PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Nonlinear Dynamics0 citationsOpen Access

Reactive collision avoidance for small unmanned aerial robots using probabilistic ellipsoidal geometry and bi-directional collision cone

JWJonghyun WooJPJongho ParkSLSeokwon Lee

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a reactive collision avoidance system for quadcopters in dynamic environments with multiple moving obstacles.
  • Developed a collision avoidance algorithm based on probabilistic ellipsoidal geometry.
  • Validated against single and multiple dynamic obstacles in numerical simulations.
  • Constructed modified collision cones in affine space to enhance computational efficiency.
  • The algorithm achieved effective collision avoidance in complex scenarios, maintaining safety margins.
  • Simulations confirmed the algorithm's ability to meet miss distance criteria where conventional methods failed.
  • Demonstrated a balance between safety and path efficiency in uncertain environments.

Abstract

With regard to reactive collision avoidance systems, accurate estimation of the states of dynamic obstacles remains challenging. This paper proposes a reactive collision avoidance system that enables safe autonomous flight of multicopters. The collision avoidance algorithm is designed for a quadcopter platform operating in a three-dimensional dynamic environment with multiple moving obstacles. We incorporate a probabilistic framework within the collision-cone approach to consider prediction uncertainties. The collision probabilities, computed based on the uncertainties in the predicted closest points of approach of dynamic obstacles, are incorporated into the computation of the ellipsoidal bounding box. The size and shape of this bounding box are adaptively adjusted based on the uncertainty, enabling conservative guidance when required and minimizing unnecessary avoidance maneuvers when the uncertainty is low. Further, a bi-directional collision cone is formulated to ensure safe margins even after avoidance, enabling the quadcopter to remain clear of the bounding box. Modified collision cones are constructed in an affine space to reduce computational complexity. Aiming point candidates are determined from the intersections of the collision cones formed by the current position of the quadcopter and its goal point. The final aiming point is selected from these candidates to execute the avoidance maneuver. The collision avoidance algorithm is validated against single and multiple dynamic obstacles via numerical simulations. The simulations confirmed that the algorithm resolved scenarios wherein conventional methods violated the miss distance criterion. The findings highlight that the algorithm affords a robust balance between safety and path efficiency in uncertain environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Woo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac4f4a46254e215b405ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-026-12471-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 13D Collision Cone-based Reactive Avoidance of Multiple Dynamic Obstacles Applied on a Quadrotor Platform2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Hybrid Nonlinear Control of Quadcopter for Collision Avoidance Approach in Static Environment2025
  3. 3Hybrid Nonlinear Control of Quadcopter for Collision Avoidance Approach in Static Environment2025
  4. 4Hybrid Nonlinear Control of Quadcopter for Collision Avoidance Approach in Static Environment2025
  5. 5Hybrid Nonlinear Control of Quadcopter for Collision Avoidance Approach in Static Environment2025