PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Unpacking the dual psychological paths of employee-AI collaboration on creativity: The role of proactive behavior

View Full Paper
BGBaorong GuoZWZaifeng WuQWQuan Wen

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how employee-AI collaboration influences creativity through self-efficacy and performance pressure.
  • Convenience sampling of 733 valid responses from six technology-driven enterprises.
  • Theoretical model tested using confirmatory factor analysis and regression analyses with AMOS and Process macro for SPSS.
  • Proactive behavior's moderating role was assessed in relation to creativity outcomes.
  • Employee-AI collaboration positively impacts creativity through self-efficacy and performance pressure pathways.
  • Higher self-efficacy leads to increased performance pressure, further enhancing creativity.
  • Proactive behavior moderates the effects, strengthening self-efficacy's association while weakening performance pressure's at high levels.

Abstract

The deep integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into organizational settings has significantly transformed employees’ work patterns, underscoring the need to investigate the mechanisms through which employee–AI collaboration influences creativity. Grounded in social cognitive theory, this study examines how employee–AI collaboration affects creativity via internal (self-efficacy) and external (performance pressure) mechanisms, and explores the moderating role of proactive behavior. Using convenience sampling, 733 valid responses were collected from six technology-driven enterprises. The theoretical model was tested through confirmatory factor analysis and regression analyses using AMOS and the Process macro for SPSS. Our results reveal that employee-AI collaboration is positively associated with creativity through two statistically supported indirect pathways: parallel indirect effects via self-efficacy (internal pathway) and performance pressure (external pathway), and a sequential indirect association in which higher self-efficacy is related to higher performance pressure, which in turn is positively related to creativity. Moreover, proactive behavior appears to moderate these relationships, such that the association between employee-AI collaboration and self-efficacy is more pronounced at higher levels of proactive behavior, whereas the association between employee-AI collaboration and performance pressure is less pronounced at higher levels of proactive behavior, yielding a pattern consistent with moderated indirect effects on creativity through both routes. These findings provide theoretical insights into the complex psychological processes underlying creativity in AI-enabled work environments and offer practical implications for optimizing AI applications and developing targeted interventions to foster employee creativity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac4f4a46254e215b412ahttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0347335
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper