Adding blood flow restriction to 8 weeks of functional strength training significantly improved average power (+92.99 W vs. +34.72 W; p<0.001) in male college sprinters.
RCT
Randomly assigned
Does adding blood flow restriction to functional strength training improve lower limb muscle strength, power, and movement quality in male college sprinters?
28 male college sprinters
Functional strength training (FST) combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) (cuffs set at 50% of arterial occlusion pressure) for 8 weeks (3 sessions/week)
Functional strength training (FST) alone for 8 weeks (3 sessions/week)
Lower limb muscle strength, maximal power, and movement quality (isokinetic knee strength at 60°·s⁻¹ and 300°·s⁻¹, countermovement jump, squat jump, Wingate 30-s anaerobic test, functional movement screen, and lower quarter Y-balance test)surrogate
Adding blood flow restriction to functional strength training in male college sprinters provided an additional benefit only for average power during the Wingate test, without significant between-group differences in other strength or movement quality metrics.
Objective: Functional strength training (FST) combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) offers additional benefits in older adults and injured patients, but evidence in athletes is limited. This study aimed to determine whether adding BFR to FST improves lower limb muscle strength, power, and movement quality in male college sprinters. Methods: Twenty‑eight male college sprinters were randomly assigned to an FST‑BFR group (n = 14, age 20.17 ± 0.65 years) or an FST group (n = 14, age 19.98 ± 0.39 years). Both groups performed the same FST program for 8 weeks (3 sessions/week). The FST‑BFR group wore cuffs set at 50% of arterial occlusion pressure. Pre‑ and post‑intervention assessments included isokinetic knee strength at 60°·s⁻¹ and 300°·s⁻¹, countermovement jump (CMJ), squat jump (SJ), Wingate 30‑s anaerobic test (average power AP, peak power PP, minimum power MinP), functional movement screen (FMS), and lower quarter Y‑balance test (YBT). Data were analysed using two‑way repeated‑measures ANOVA (parametric) and Wilcoxon/Mann‑Whitney tests (non‑parametric). Results: Both groups improved over time in most measures (p 0.05). No significant interactions were found for YBT, FMS, or other isokinetic variables (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: Eight weeks of FST, with or without BFR, was associated with significant improvements over time in isokinetic strength, movement quality, and dynamic balance in male college sprinters; however, in the absence of a no-intervention control group, these improvements cannot be directly attributed to the FST programme itself. The addition of BFR provided an additional benefit only for average power during the Wingate test.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yihan Hu
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yihan Hu (Fri,) conducted a rct in Healthy male college sprinters (n=28). Functional strength training (FST) with blood flow restriction (BFR) vs. Functional strength training (FST) alone was evaluated on Average power (AP) during Wingate 30-s anaerobic test (mean change in Watts) (η²ₚ 0.756, p=<0.001). Adding blood flow restriction to 8 weeks of functional strength training significantly improved average power (+92.99 W vs. +34.72 W; p<0.001) in male college sprinters.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac4f4a46254e215b41e2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.129550
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: