PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

LpBound in Action: Cardinality Estimation with One-Sided Guarantees

View Full Paper
CMChristoph MayerHZHaozhe ZhangMKMahmoud Abo Khamis

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop and validate LpBound, an estimator for upper bounds on query output sizes using data statistics.
  • Designed LpBound to leverage ℓ$_{p}$-norms of degree sequences from join columns.
  • Formulated the cardinality estimation problem using linear programming constrained by Shannon and information inequalities.
  • Provided a visual interface for users to select queries and norms for estimation.
  • LpBound computes an upper bound on query output sizes within milliseconds.
  • Demonstrated accuracy through comparison with traditional and learned estimators, showing superior estimation capabilities.
  • Detailed estimation errors were provided, allowing insightful analysis of LpBound's performance.

Abstract

We demonstrate LpBound, a cardinality estimator that computes guaranteed upper bounds on the output size of a given query. Among the wealth of traditional, learned, and pessimistic estimators, LpBound's uniqueness lies in its use of two key ingredients: (1) data statistics based on ℓ₏-norms of degree sequences of the join columns, and (2) a linear program formulation of the cardinality estimation problem, whose constraints are the Shannon inequalities and new information inequalities derived from data statistics. LpBound comes with a visual interface accessible in the browser. The users can interact with the interface by choosing a query from the JOB, STATS, and Subgraph Matching benchmarks and the range of ℓ₏-norms available to LpBound. Within a few milliseconds, LpBound computes an upper bound on the query output size. This bound is explained by a closed-form formula using the available ℓ₏-norms. The users can also inspect the estimation errors of LpBound and a variety of other estimators.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mayer et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edacbd4a46254e215b465dhttps://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-433764
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1LpBound: Pessimistic Cardinality Estimation Using ℓ$_{p}$-Normsof Degree Sequences2025
  2. 2Reproducibility Report for ACM SIGMOD 2025 Paper: 'LpBound: Pessimistic Cardinality Estimation Using Lp -Norms of Degree Sequences'2025
  3. 3Join Size Bounds using l p -Norms on Degree Sequences2024 · 9 citations
  4. 4CorrBound: Cardinality Estimation Accounting for Inter- and Intra-relation Correlations2026
  5. 5CorrBound: Cardinality Estimation Accounting for Inter- and Intra-relation Correlations2026