Eye tracking (ET) provides process-level indices of how students sample task-relevant information during core academic activities. In school-age learners (6–18 years) with specific learning disorders (SLDs; dyslexia, dysgraphia, and dyscalculia), ET can complement behavioural assessment by quantifying oculomotor patterns linked to decoding, model–production coordination, and stepwise strategy execution. This narrative review synthesises ET findings in SLD across reading, handwriting/copying, and arithmetic and translates them into an applied framework for school-oriented use. We summarise key metrics and Areas of Interest (AOI)-based analyses, highlight technical and data-quality requirements for valid acquisition in educational settings, and outline compact functional assessment protocols integrated with standard academic and neuropsychological measures. Building on these foundations, we propose six hypothesis-driven gaze-contingent paradigms (H1–H6) as preliminary models for future experimental testing rather than as established interventions, and we map each to its current level of empirical support, specifying primary gaze outcomes and curriculum-relevant behavioural endpoints. We emphasise that eye-movement findings in specific learning disorders are heterogeneous and may vary as a function of age, task demands, and comorbidity. Accordingly, credible training effects require retention and transfer probes under standard, non-contingent display conditions, appropriate controls, and explicit developmental interpretation. Eye tracking is positioned as complementary functional evidence and as a platform for experimentally testable, mechanism-based interventions in school-age specific learning disorders.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pierluigi Diotaiuti
Francesco Di Siena
Salvatore Vitiello
Journal of Eye Movement Research
Università degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Diotaiuti et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69edacdb4a46254e215b484a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19030042