PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science0 citations

Continuous growth of social polarization for scale-free networks

View Full Paper
BPBin PanJLJianguo Liu

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how structural heterogeneity impacts social polarization dynamics in scale-free networks.
  • Introduced a co-evolutionary opinion model on scale-free networks using a modified Holme-Kim model.
  • Analyzed the growth of polarization with increasing connectivity among nodes.
  • Conducted counterfactual experiments to assess the impact of neutralizing high-degree nodes.
  • Polarization in scale-free networks grows continuously with increased connectivity, differing from small-world networks.
  • Social polarization emerges earlier but reaches a lower magnitude compared to small-world networks.
  • Neutralizing the top 5% of high-degree nodes can significantly reduce polarization to baseline levels.

Abstract

Understanding how local interactions generate social polarization is a central challenge in the study of collective dynamics. Prior work has established that homophily and social balance can trigger a first-order phase transition to polarization in homogeneous small-world networks. However, real-world social networks are structurally heterogeneous, featuring power-law degree distributions dominated by a few highly connected hubs. In this study, we investigate how this structural heterogeneity affects polarization dynamics by introducing the co-evolutionary opinion model on scale-free networks generated via a modified Holme-Kim model. We find that, in contrast to the discontinuous transition in small-world networks, social polarization for scale-free networks grows continuously with increasing connectivity, emerging earlier but reaching a lower magnitude. Individual-level analysis reveals that polarization is a hierarchical process concentrated among large-degree hubs, while most peripheral nodes remain weakly polarized. Counterfactual experiments demonstrate that neutralizing only the top 5% of large-degree nodes is sufficient to suppress system-wide polarization to the random baseline. Our findings reveal that network topology fundamentally alters the nature of polarization transitions and suggest that targeted interventions on influential nodes may be more effective than broad-based approaches for managing social polarization in heterogeneous societies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edacdb4a46254e215b4941https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0322613
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper