PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Movement Ecology0 citationsOpen Access

The ‘aukward’ use of hidden Markov models in a pursuit-diving seabird: semi-supervised HMMs improve behavioural classification and energetic inference in auks

ADAstrid DedieuSCSam L. CoxJDJamie Darby

Key Points

  • This research aims to refine behavioural classification and energetic inference in pursuit-diving seabirds using hidden Markov models.
  • Deployed GPS-time depth recorders on 28 puffins during the breeding seasons of 2021, 2023, and 2024.
  • Compared inferred behaviours using GPS-only, dive-informed, semi-supervised, and fully supervised hidden Markov models.
  • Employed state forcing rules to delineate behavioural states.
  • The semi-supervised model accurately classified 89% of segments with dives as foraging.
  • The dive-informed model estimated energetic expenditure by 12–21% more than models without forcing rules.
  • The approach provided a conservative classification of transit behaviours, avoiding overestimation of foraging segments.

Abstract

Global seabird declines underline the need for accurate behavioural inference at sea to guide conservation. For pursuit-diving species such as auks, differentiating between resting and foraging is difficult due to similar above-water movement patterns, biasing estimates of behaviour-specific habitat use and energy expenditure. We deployed combined GPS-time depth recorders on 28 puffins during the 2021, 2023, and 2024 breeding seasons and compared inferred behaviours using outputs from GPS-only, dive-informed, semi and fully supervised hidden Markov models (HMMs) using state forcing rules. GPS-only and dive-informed models routinely conflated resting/drifting and foraging behaviours. The semi-supervised model best distinguished behavioural states, identifying 89% of track segments containing at least one dive as foraging, providing a more conservative approach compared to the supervised model when classifying transit, while avoiding inflating the number of foraging for segments with large step lengths. Compared to the GPS-only model, used here as baseline, the dive-informed model provided greater estimates of energetic expenditure by 12–21% relative to the models using forcing rules. Integrating dive data into a semi-supervised HMM refines behavioural classification, enabling more realistic energy budgets and precise mapping of important behaviour-specific habitats for conservation planning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dedieu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edad274a46254e215b4cdfhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-026-00658-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The efficiency of detecting seabird behaviour from movement patterns: the effect of sampling frequency on inferring movement metrics in Procellariiformes2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Seabird bycatch in European waters2024 · 33 citations
  3. 3EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS2004 · 824 citations
  4. 4Modelling the abundance and distribution of marine birds accounting for uncertain species identification2014 · 31 citations
  5. 5A Dispersive Migration in the Atlantic Puffin and Its Implications for Migratory Navigation2011 · 166 citations